Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 442-473 |
Number of pages | 32 |
Journal | DIPLOMACY AND STATECRAFT |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Accepted/In press | 13 Apr 2021 |
Published | 29 Sep 2022 |
Additional links |
This study examines whether “invasion scares” before 1914 period had an impact on the course of British strategy. It shows that contemporary observers perceived a clear link between the ways in which British society depicted and understood issues of strategy and the ways in which the state could prepare for and conduct a future war. This was particularly so when it came to the language used to describe issues of security in Britain and the ideological consensus that these discourses reflected. The prominent place of discussions about how to defend the British Isles against invasion before 1914 therefore convinced some observers that Briton’s preoccupation with passive defence was rendering the nation vulnerable by robbing it of the capacity to adopt credible policies of deterrence and offensive action.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454