Self-insight research as (double) model recovery

Tim Rakow

doi:10.1017/S0140525X13000824

Self-insight research as (double) model recovery

Tim Rakow^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Psychology

University of Essex

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Self-insight assessment compares outcomes from two model-recovery exercises: a statistical exercise to infer a judge's (implicit) policy and an elicitation exercise whereby the judge describes his or her (explicit) policy. When these policies are mismatched, limited self-insight is not necessarily implied: Shortcomings in either exercise could be implicated, whereby Newell & Shanks' (N&S's) relevance or sensitivity criteria for assessing awareness may not be met. Appropriate self-insight assessment requires that both exercises allow the original processes to be captured.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	37-38
Number of pages	2
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	37
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13000824
Publication status	Published - 1 Feb 2014

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X13000824

Cite this

@article{00229a4bbb1d4cbfba09201da322672f,

title = "Self-insight research as (double) model recovery",

abstract = "Self-insight assessment compares outcomes from two model-recovery exercises: a statistical exercise to infer a judge's (implicit) policy and an elicitation exercise whereby the judge describes his or her (explicit) policy. When these policies are mismatched, limited self-insight is not necessarily implied: Shortcomings in either exercise could be implicated, whereby Newell & Shanks' (N&S's) relevance or sensitivity criteria for assessing awareness may not be met. Appropriate self-insight assessment requires that both exercises allow the original processes to be captured. ",

author = "Tim Rakow",

note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} Cambridge University Press 2014. Not freely accessible but may have access through institution",

year = "2014",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X13000824",

language = "English",

volume = "37",

pages = "37--38",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-insight research as (double) model recovery

AU - Rakow, Tim

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - Self-insight assessment compares outcomes from two model-recovery exercises: a statistical exercise to infer a judge's (implicit) policy and an elicitation exercise whereby the judge describes his or her (explicit) policy. When these policies are mismatched, limited self-insight is not necessarily implied: Shortcomings in either exercise could be implicated, whereby Newell & Shanks' (N&S's) relevance or sensitivity criteria for assessing awareness may not be met. Appropriate self-insight assessment requires that both exercises allow the original processes to be captured.

AB - Self-insight assessment compares outcomes from two model-recovery exercises: a statistical exercise to infer a judge's (implicit) policy and an elicitation exercise whereby the judge describes his or her (explicit) policy. When these policies are mismatched, limited self-insight is not necessarily implied: Shortcomings in either exercise could be implicated, whereby Newell & Shanks' (N&S's) relevance or sensitivity criteria for assessing awareness may not be met. Appropriate self-insight assessment requires that both exercises allow the original processes to be captured.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896375217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X13000824

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X13000824

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 24461368

AN - SCOPUS:84896375217

SN - 0140-525X

VL - 37

SP - 37

EP - 38

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

IS - 1

ER -

Self-insight research as (double) model recovery

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this