Sentenced to treatment: Early experience of drug treatment and testing orders in England

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sentenced to treatment: Early experience of drug treatment and testing orders in England

AU - Finch, E

AU - Brotchie, J

AU - Williams, K

AU - Ruben, S

AU - Felix, L

AU - Strang, J

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Drug Treatment and Testing Orders (DTTOs) were introduced in the 1998 Crime and Disorder Bill and were piloted in three areas in England over the subsequent 18 months. The orders, funded by the Home Office, allow drug using offenders to be coerced into attending for treatment, to have regular urine tests and to be reviewed by the courts. In Croydon an equal partnership was set up between probation, a local statutory provider of drug services and a voluntary sector agency. Treatment plans were individualised and included a variety of treatment options. Forty-eight orders were imposed mainly for persistent shoplifting. Sixty-three percent of individuals had used heroin and 54% crack cocaine in the 30 days before the order was imposed. Ethical issues raised in coerced treatment were important for the individuals providing treatment although the clients all had to consent to treatment. The pilot programme raised issues about the nature of treatment, clinical responsibility, the selection of clients for orders and the objectives of treatment. Frequent urine testing was problematic but in the vast majority of cases clients were not breached just because of positive tests. The provision of DTTOs in an area created unacceptable inequalities in access to treatment. The paper concludes that partnership working and clear objectives are vital for treatment programmes to operate effectively. More research is needed to explore the most optimum way to deliver treatment in the context of a DTTO. Copyright (C) 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.

AB - Drug Treatment and Testing Orders (DTTOs) were introduced in the 1998 Crime and Disorder Bill and were piloted in three areas in England over the subsequent 18 months. The orders, funded by the Home Office, allow drug using offenders to be coerced into attending for treatment, to have regular urine tests and to be reviewed by the courts. In Croydon an equal partnership was set up between probation, a local statutory provider of drug services and a voluntary sector agency. Treatment plans were individualised and included a variety of treatment options. Forty-eight orders were imposed mainly for persistent shoplifting. Sixty-three percent of individuals had used heroin and 54% crack cocaine in the 30 days before the order was imposed. Ethical issues raised in coerced treatment were important for the individuals providing treatment although the clients all had to consent to treatment. The pilot programme raised issues about the nature of treatment, clinical responsibility, the selection of clients for orders and the objectives of treatment. Frequent urine testing was problematic but in the vast majority of cases clients were not breached just because of positive tests. The provision of DTTOs in an area created unacceptable inequalities in access to treatment. The paper concludes that partnership working and clear objectives are vital for treatment programmes to operate effectively. More research is needed to explore the most optimum way to deliver treatment in the context of a DTTO. Copyright (C) 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038349573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000070981

DO - 10.1159/000070981

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 131

EP - 137

JO - European Addiction Research

JF - European Addiction Research

IS - 3

ER -