Shifting Accounts of Justice: The Legalisation and Politicisation of International Criminal Justice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

n December 2015, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda delivered its final verdict in Butare, bringing the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda to a close after 21-years. Despite the important role that the tribunal played in confirming international criminal justice as a key transitional justice mechanism, and tool of international peace and security, there has been little retrospective analysis of the court’s history. This article draws on a Bourdieusian field analysis to address the absence and makes two contributions. First, it demonstrates that over the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’s history the tribunal’s conception of justice shifted from a weak form of restorative justice to a more traditional form of retributive justice. Second, it reveals that this shift was the result of a ‘settling’ on the law and, more importantly, UN Security Council interventions. This legalisation and politicisation of trial practice saw a shift in the field from prioritising moral authority to legal and delegated authority.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSOCIAL AND LEGAL STUDIES
Publication statusPublished - 8 Dec 2021

Keywords

  • Archive
  • ICTR
  • RWANDA
  • testimony
  • International courts

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shifting Accounts of Justice: The Legalisation and Politicisation of International Criminal Justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this