TY - JOUR
T1 - Short-Form HIV Disability Questionnaire Sensibility, Utility, and Implementation Considerations in Community-Based Settings
T2 - A Mixed Methods Study
AU - O’Brien, Kelly K.
AU - Ibáñez-Carrasco, Francisco
AU - Solomon, Patricia
AU - Chan Carusone, Soo
AU - Stewart, Ann
AU - Bayoumi, Ahmed M.
AU - Brown, Darren A.
AU - Quigley, Adria
AU - Ahluwalia, Puja
AU - Erlandson, Kristine M.
AU - Vera, Jaime H.
AU - Bergin, Colm
AU - Hanna, Steven E.
AU - Swinton, Marilyn
AU - Torres, Brittany
AU - McDuff, Kiera
AU - Da Silva, George
AU - Bradford, Glen
AU - Islam, Shaz
AU - Price, Colleen
AU - Lindsay, Joanne D.
AU - Murray, Carolann
AU - McClellan, Natalia
AU - Krizmancic, Katrina
AU - Anand, Praney
AU - Yates, Tammy
AU - Baltzer Turje, Rosalind
AU - McDougall, Patrick
AU - Maksimcev, Vladislava Vlatka
AU - Harding, Richard
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge those who volunteered their time to participate in this research as well as staff and volunteers in the community-based organization settings who supported the implementation of this research. We thank the following community-based organization and community health center settings for their collaborations and support in this research including the Alliance for South Asian AIDS Prevention (ASAAP), AIDS Committee of Toronto (ACT), Toronto People with AIDS Foundation (PWA), St. Michael's Hospital Academic Family Health Team, Wellesley-St. Jamestown site, Dr Peter Centre/Dr Peter AIDS Foundation, AIDS Vancouver, and AIDS Community Care Montreal (ACCM). Kelly K. O’Brien was supported by a Canada Research Chair (Tier 2) in Episodic Disability and Rehabilitation from the Canada Research Chairs Program. Ahmed M. Bayoumi was supported by the Fondation Alma and Baxter Ricard Chair in Inner City Health at St. Michael's Hospital and the University of Toronto.
Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge those who volunteered their time to participate in this research as well as staff and volunteers in the community-based organization settings who supported the implementation of this research. We thank the following community-based organization and community health center settings for their collaborations and support in this research including the Alliance for South Asian AIDS Prevention (ASAAP), AIDS Committee of Toronto (ACT), Toronto People with AIDS Foundation (PWA), St. Michael's Hospital Academic Family Health Team, Wellesley-St. Jamestown site, Dr Peter Centre/Dr Peter AIDS Foundation, AIDS Vancouver, and AIDS Community Care Montreal (ACCM). Kelly K. O’Brien was supported by a Canada Research Chair (Tier 2) in Episodic Disability and Rehabilitation from the Canada Research Chairs Program. Ahmed M. Bayoumi was supported by the Fondation Alma and Baxter Ricard Chair in Inner City Health at St. Michael's Hospital and the University of Toronto. The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Funding Reference Number: CBR-170102). Kelly K. O’Brien was supported by a Canada Research Chair (Tier 2) in Episodic Disability and Rehabilitation from the Canada Research Chairs Program. Ahmed M. Bayoumi was supported by the Fondation Alma and Baxter Ricard Chair in Inner City Health at St. Michael's Hospital and the University of Toronto.
Funding Information:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Funding Reference Number: CBR-170102). Kelly K. O’Brien was supported by a Canada Research Chair (Tier 2) in Episodic Disability and Rehabilitation from the Canada Research Chairs Program. Ahmed M. Bayoumi was supported by the Fondation Alma and Baxter Ricard Chair in Inner City Health at St. Michael's Hospital and the University of Toronto.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - Purpose: We assessed the sensibility, utility, and implementation considerations of the Short-Form HIV Disability Questionnaire (SF-HDQ) in community-based settings. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study with adults living with HIV and community providers in seven community sites in Canada. We administered the SF-HDQ, a sensibility questionnaire and conducted semi-structured interviews. The SF-HDQ was sensible if median scores were ≥5/7(adults living with HIV) and ≥4/7(community providers) for ≥80% of the sensibility questionnaire items. Qualitative interview data were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Median sensibility scores were ≥5 for adults living with HIV (n = 44) and ≥4 for community providers (n = 10) for 95% and 100% of items, respectively. The SF-HDQ is comprehensive, represented disability, captured its episodic nature, and was easy to complete. Community utility included: facilitating communication and engagement with community; taking a snapshot of disability and tracking changes over time; guiding referrals; fostering self-reflection; and informing community programs. Considerations for implementation included flexible, person-centered approaches to mode and processes of administration, and communicating scores based on personal preferences among persons living with HIV. Conclusion: The SF-HDQ possesses sensibility and utility for use in community-based settings.
AB - Purpose: We assessed the sensibility, utility, and implementation considerations of the Short-Form HIV Disability Questionnaire (SF-HDQ) in community-based settings. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study with adults living with HIV and community providers in seven community sites in Canada. We administered the SF-HDQ, a sensibility questionnaire and conducted semi-structured interviews. The SF-HDQ was sensible if median scores were ≥5/7(adults living with HIV) and ≥4/7(community providers) for ≥80% of the sensibility questionnaire items. Qualitative interview data were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Median sensibility scores were ≥5 for adults living with HIV (n = 44) and ≥4 for community providers (n = 10) for 95% and 100% of items, respectively. The SF-HDQ is comprehensive, represented disability, captured its episodic nature, and was easy to complete. Community utility included: facilitating communication and engagement with community; taking a snapshot of disability and tracking changes over time; guiding referrals; fostering self-reflection; and informing community programs. Considerations for implementation included flexible, person-centered approaches to mode and processes of administration, and communicating scores based on personal preferences among persons living with HIV. Conclusion: The SF-HDQ possesses sensibility and utility for use in community-based settings.
KW - community-based research
KW - disability
KW - HIV
KW - measurement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177665498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/23259582231210801
DO - 10.1177/23259582231210801
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85177665498
SN - 2325-9574
VL - 22
JO - Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
JF - Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
ER -