King's College London

Research portal

Simulation in Urological Training and Education (SIMULATE): Protocol and curriculum development of the first multicentre international randomized controlled trial assessing the transferability of simulation‐based surgical training

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

SIMULATE Trial Group, Abdullatif Aydin, Kamran Ahmed, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Hashim U Ahmed, Muhammad Shamim Khan, Prokar Dasgupta

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)202-211
Number of pages10
JournalBJU International
Volume126
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2020

Bibliographical note

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

King's Authors

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report the study protocol for the first international multicentre randomised controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of simulation-based surgical training and development process of an evidence-based training curriculum, to be delivered as an educational intervention.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This prospective, international, multicentre randomised controlled clinical and educational trial will recruit urology surgical trainees who must not have performed ≥ 10 of the selected index procedure, ureterorenoscopy (URS). Participants will be randomised to simulation-based training (SBT) or non-simulation-based training (NSBT), the latter of which is the current sole standard of training globally. The primary outcome is the number of procedures required to achieve proficiency, where proficiency is defined as achieving a learning curve plateau of 28 or more on an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) assessment scale, on 3 consecutive operations, without any complications. All participants will be followed up until they complete 25 procedures or over 18 months. Development of the URS SBT curriculum took place through a 2-round Delphi process.

RESULTS: A total of 47 respondents consisting of trainees (n=24), with URS experience, and urolithiasis specialists (n=23) participated in round-1 of the Delphi process. Specialists (n=10) finalised the contents of the curriculum in round-2. The developed interventional curriculum consists of initial theoretic knowledge through didactic lectures followed by select tasks and cases on the URO-Mentor (Simbionix, Israel) VR Simulator, Uro-Scopic Trainer (Limbs & Things, UK) and Scope Trainer (Mediskills, UK) models for both semi-rigid and flexible URS. Respondents also selected relevant non-technical skills scenarios and cadaveric simulation tasks as additional components, delivery subject to local availability.

CONCLUSIONS: SIMULATE is the first multicentre trial investigating the effect and transferability of supplementary SBT on operating performance and patient outcomes. An evidence-based training curriculum is presented, developed with expert and trainee input. Participants will be followed and the primary outcome, number of procedures required to proficiency, will be reported alongside key clinical secondary outcomes, (ISCRTN 12260261).

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454