TY - JOUR
T1 - Small Retailers’ Tobacco Sales and Profit Margins in Two Disadvantaged Areas of England
AU - Hitchman, Sara Christine Brenda
AU - Calder, Robert Ian
AU - Rooke, Catriona Gail
AU - McNeill, Ann Denise
PY - 2016/3/14
Y1 - 2016/3/14
N2 - Aim: To explore tobacco profit margins and sales among small retailers in England.
Methods: Interviews with managers/owners of 62 small retail shops that sold tobacco in
disadvantaged areas of Newcastle and London, England. The interviews included questions about
tobacco sales and profit margins, and interest in reducing reliance on tobacco sales. Results: The
majority of retailers (89%) reported low overall profit margins on tobacco sales (< 6%). The most
common response was a profit margin of 4–6%,with some reporting lower margins for price-marked
packs of cigarettes (1–6%) and higher margins for non-price marked or premium brands (7% to over
10%). A few mentioned higher profit margins for e-cigarettes. Despite this, most thought tobacco
sales were important (90%), and attributed this reliance to footfall (81%), i.e., customers purchasing
tobacco also purchasing other products. 42% of retailers expressed interest in reducing their reliance
on tobacco sales. Conclusions: Small retailers report low tobacco profit margins, but high reliance
on tobacco sales because of footfall. Retailer interest in reducing reliance on tobacco sales warrants
further research into opportunities for disinvestment. Additionally, retailers’ belief that they are
reliant on tobacco sales because of footfall should be further investigated.
AB - Aim: To explore tobacco profit margins and sales among small retailers in England.
Methods: Interviews with managers/owners of 62 small retail shops that sold tobacco in
disadvantaged areas of Newcastle and London, England. The interviews included questions about
tobacco sales and profit margins, and interest in reducing reliance on tobacco sales. Results: The
majority of retailers (89%) reported low overall profit margins on tobacco sales (< 6%). The most
common response was a profit margin of 4–6%,with some reporting lower margins for price-marked
packs of cigarettes (1–6%) and higher margins for non-price marked or premium brands (7% to over
10%). A few mentioned higher profit margins for e-cigarettes. Despite this, most thought tobacco
sales were important (90%), and attributed this reliance to footfall (81%), i.e., customers purchasing
tobacco also purchasing other products. 42% of retailers expressed interest in reducing their reliance
on tobacco sales. Conclusions: Small retailers report low tobacco profit margins, but high reliance
on tobacco sales because of footfall. Retailer interest in reducing reliance on tobacco sales warrants
further research into opportunities for disinvestment. Additionally, retailers’ belief that they are
reliant on tobacco sales because of footfall should be further investigated.
U2 - 10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.110
DO - 10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.110
M3 - Article
SN - 2327-8994
VL - 3
SP - 110
EP - 115
JO - AIMS Public Health
JF - AIMS Public Health
IS - 1
ER -