TY - JOUR
T1 - Social disadvantage, linguistic distance, ethnic minority status and first-episode psychosis
T2 - Results from the EU-GEI case-control study
AU - Jongsma, Hannah E.
AU - Gayer-Anderson, Charlotte
AU - Tarricone, Ilaria
AU - Velthorst, Eva
AU - Van Der Ven, Els
AU - Quattrone, Diego
AU - Di Forti, Marta
AU - Menezes, Paulo Rossi
AU - Del-Ben, Christina Marta
AU - Arango, Celso
AU - Lasalvia, Antonio
AU - Berardi, Domenico
AU - La Cascia, Caterina
AU - Bobes, Julio
AU - Bernardo, Miguel
AU - Sanjuán, Julio
AU - Santos, Jose Luis
AU - Arrojo, Manuel
AU - De Haan, Lieuwe
AU - Tortelli, Andrea
AU - Szöke, Andrei
AU - Murray, Robin M.
AU - Rutten, Bart P.
AU - Van Os, Jim
AU - Morgan, Craig
AU - Jones, Peter B.
AU - Kirkbride, James B.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - BackgroundEthnic minority groups in Western countries face an increased risk of psychotic disorders. Causes of this long-standing public health inequality remain poorly understood. We investigated whether social disadvantage, linguistic distance and discrimination contributed to these patterns.MethodsWe used case-control data from the EUropean network of national schizophrenia networks studying Gene-Environment Interactions (EU-GEI) study, carried out in 16 centres in six countries. We recruited 1130 cases and 1497 population-based controls. Our main outcome measure was first-episode ICD-10 psychotic disorder (F20-F33), and exposures were ethnicity (white majority, black, mixed, Asian, North-African, white minority and other), generational status, social disadvantage, linguistic distance and discrimination. Age, sex, paternal age, cannabis use, childhood trauma and parental history of psychosis were included as a priori confounders. Exposures and confounders were added sequentially to multivariable logistic models, following multiple imputation for missing data.ResultsParticipants from any ethnic minority background had crude excess odds of psychosis [odds ratio (OR) 2.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.69-2.43], which remained after adjustment for confounders (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.31-1.98). This was progressively attenuated following further adjustment for social disadvantage (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.22-1.89) and linguistic distance (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.95-1.57), a pattern mirrored in several specific ethnic groups. Linguistic distance and social disadvantage had stronger effects for first- A nd later-generation groups, respectively.ConclusionSocial disadvantage and linguistic distance, two potential markers of sociocultural exclusion, were associated with increased odds of psychotic disorder, and adjusting for these led to equivocal risk between several ethnic minority groups and the white majority.
AB - BackgroundEthnic minority groups in Western countries face an increased risk of psychotic disorders. Causes of this long-standing public health inequality remain poorly understood. We investigated whether social disadvantage, linguistic distance and discrimination contributed to these patterns.MethodsWe used case-control data from the EUropean network of national schizophrenia networks studying Gene-Environment Interactions (EU-GEI) study, carried out in 16 centres in six countries. We recruited 1130 cases and 1497 population-based controls. Our main outcome measure was first-episode ICD-10 psychotic disorder (F20-F33), and exposures were ethnicity (white majority, black, mixed, Asian, North-African, white minority and other), generational status, social disadvantage, linguistic distance and discrimination. Age, sex, paternal age, cannabis use, childhood trauma and parental history of psychosis were included as a priori confounders. Exposures and confounders were added sequentially to multivariable logistic models, following multiple imputation for missing data.ResultsParticipants from any ethnic minority background had crude excess odds of psychosis [odds ratio (OR) 2.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.69-2.43], which remained after adjustment for confounders (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.31-1.98). This was progressively attenuated following further adjustment for social disadvantage (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.22-1.89) and linguistic distance (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.95-1.57), a pattern mirrored in several specific ethnic groups. Linguistic distance and social disadvantage had stronger effects for first- A nd later-generation groups, respectively.ConclusionSocial disadvantage and linguistic distance, two potential markers of sociocultural exclusion, were associated with increased odds of psychotic disorder, and adjusting for these led to equivocal risk between several ethnic minority groups and the white majority.
KW - Discrimination
KW - epidemiology
KW - ethnicity
KW - psychotic disorders
KW - social disadvantage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081607960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S003329172000029X
DO - 10.1017/S003329172000029X
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85081607960
SN - 0033-2917
JO - Psychological Medicine
JF - Psychological Medicine
ER -