Social Media Policies: Implications for contemporary notions of corporate social responsibility

Cynthia Stohl, Michael Andreas Etter, Scott Banghart, DaJong Woo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

79 Citations (Scopus)
49 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Three global developments situate the context of this investigation: the increasing use of social media by organizations and their employees, the burgeoning presence of social media policies, and the heightened focus on corporate social responsibility (CSR). In this study, the intersection of these trends is examined through a content analysis of 112 publicly available social media policies from the largest corporations in the world. The extent to which social media policies facilitate and/or constrain the communicative sensibilities and values associated with contemporary notions of CSR are considered. Overall, findings indicate that a large majority of policies, regardless of sector or national headquarters, increasingly inhibit communicative tenets of contemporary CSR (i.e., free speech, collective information sharing, and stakeholder engagement/dialogue) and thereby diminish employee negotiation and participation in the social responsibilities of corporations. Moreover, policies generally enact organizational communication practices that are contrary to international CSR guidelines (e.g., the UN Global Compact and other international agreements). Findings suggest that social media policies represent a relatively unrecognized development in the institutionalization of CSR communicative norms and practices that call into question the promising affordances of social media for the inclusion of various voices in the public negotiation of what constitutes corporate social responsibility.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-436
Number of pages27
JournalJOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
Volume142
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jul 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social Media Policies: Implications for contemporary notions of corporate social responsibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this