Sociolinguistics, memory studies, and the dynamics of interdisciplinarity

Ben Rampton; Thomas Van De Putte

doi:10.1017/S0047404524000927

Sociolinguistics, memory studies, and the dynamics of interdisciplinarity

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article uses a dialogue between memory studies (MS) and ethnographic and interactional sociolinguistics (EIS) to explore the dynamics of interdisciplinarity. MS focuses on the social remembering of high-profile and often traumatic events, and this is relevant to EIS's growing interest in (in)securitization. MS is increasingly keen to explore everyday practices of remembering in interscalar analyses, and EIS' expertise in the study of mundane communication can provide essential support. But there are major differences in their focal concerns and analytical cultures, as well as in their approaches to interdisciplinarity. This generates asymmetries in their exchange, which we illustrate with studies from Oświȩcim/Auschwitz (MS) and Cyprus (EIS). By mapping these differences and highlighting collaborative data sessions as a practical arena for building relationships, the article seeks to deepen our understanding of interdisciplinarity and facilitate its practice.

Original language	English
Number of pages	24
Journal	Language in Society
Early online date	28 Nov 2024
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404524000927
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 28 Nov 2024

Access to Document

10.1017/S0047404524000927Licence: CC BY

Sociolinguistics, memory studies_RAMPTON_Publishedonline28November2024_VoR (CC BY)Final published version, 636 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{56eb570f7e714ddaadb3ad94a2b33d8f,

title = "Sociolinguistics, memory studies, and the dynamics of interdisciplinarity",

abstract = "This article uses a dialogue between memory studies (MS) and ethnographic and interactional sociolinguistics (EIS) to explore the dynamics of interdisciplinarity. MS focuses on the social remembering of high-profile and often traumatic events, and this is relevant to EIS's growing interest in (in)securitization. MS is increasingly keen to explore everyday practices of remembering in interscalar analyses, and EIS' expertise in the study of mundane communication can provide essential support. But there are major differences in their focal concerns and analytical cultures, as well as in their approaches to interdisciplinarity. This generates asymmetries in their exchange, which we illustrate with studies from O{\'s}wiȩcim/Auschwitz (MS) and Cyprus (EIS). By mapping these differences and highlighting collaborative data sessions as a practical arena for building relationships, the article seeks to deepen our understanding of interdisciplinarity and facilitate its practice.",

author = "Ben Rampton and \{Van De Putte\}, Thomas",

note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} The Author(s), 2024.",

year = "2024",

month = nov,

day = "28",

doi = "10.1017/S0047404524000927",

language = "English",

journal = "Language in Society",

issn = "0047-4045",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sociolinguistics, memory studies, and the dynamics of interdisciplinarity

AU - Rampton, Ben

AU - Van De Putte, Thomas

PY - 2024/11/28

Y1 - 2024/11/28

N2 - This article uses a dialogue between memory studies (MS) and ethnographic and interactional sociolinguistics (EIS) to explore the dynamics of interdisciplinarity. MS focuses on the social remembering of high-profile and often traumatic events, and this is relevant to EIS's growing interest in (in)securitization. MS is increasingly keen to explore everyday practices of remembering in interscalar analyses, and EIS' expertise in the study of mundane communication can provide essential support. But there are major differences in their focal concerns and analytical cultures, as well as in their approaches to interdisciplinarity. This generates asymmetries in their exchange, which we illustrate with studies from Oświȩcim/Auschwitz (MS) and Cyprus (EIS). By mapping these differences and highlighting collaborative data sessions as a practical arena for building relationships, the article seeks to deepen our understanding of interdisciplinarity and facilitate its practice.

AB - This article uses a dialogue between memory studies (MS) and ethnographic and interactional sociolinguistics (EIS) to explore the dynamics of interdisciplinarity. MS focuses on the social remembering of high-profile and often traumatic events, and this is relevant to EIS's growing interest in (in)securitization. MS is increasingly keen to explore everyday practices of remembering in interscalar analyses, and EIS' expertise in the study of mundane communication can provide essential support. But there are major differences in their focal concerns and analytical cultures, as well as in their approaches to interdisciplinarity. This generates asymmetries in their exchange, which we illustrate with studies from Oświȩcim/Auschwitz (MS) and Cyprus (EIS). By mapping these differences and highlighting collaborative data sessions as a practical arena for building relationships, the article seeks to deepen our understanding of interdisciplinarity and facilitate its practice.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85210909076

U2 - 10.1017/S0047404524000927

DO - 10.1017/S0047404524000927

M3 - Article

SN - 0047-4045

JO - Language in Society

JF - Language in Society

ER -

Sociolinguistics, memory studies, and the dynamics of interdisciplinarity

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this