King's College London

Research portal

Spatially resolved flux measurements of NOX from London suggest significantly higher emissions than predicted by inventories

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Adam R. Vaughan, James D. Lee, Pawel K. Misztal, Stefan Metzger, Marvin D. Shaw, Alastair C. Lewis, Ruth M. Purvis, David C. Carslaw, Allen H. Goldstein, C. Nicholas Hewitt, Brian Davison, Sean D. Beevers, Thomas G. Karl

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)455-472
Number of pages18
JournalFaraday Discussions
Volume189
Early online date30 Nov 2015
DOIs
Accepted/In press30 Nov 2015
E-pub ahead of print30 Nov 2015
Published1 Jul 2016

Bibliographical note

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

To date, direct validation of city-wide emissions inventories for air pollutants has been difficult or impossible. However, recent technological innovations now allow direct measurement of pollutant fluxes from cities, for comparison with emissions inventories, which are themselves commonly used for prediction of current and future air quality and to help guide abatement strategies. Fluxes of NOx were measured using the eddy-covariance technique from an aircraft flying at low altitude over London. The highest fluxes were observed over central London, with lower fluxes measured in suburban areas. A footprint model was used to estimate the spatial area from which the measured emissions occurred. This allowed comparison of the flux measurements to the UK's National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory (NAEI) for NOx, with scaling factors used to account for the actual time of day, day of week and month of year of the measurement. The comparison suggests significant underestimation of NOx emissions in London by the NAEI, mainly due to its under-representation of real world road traffic emissions. A comparison was also carried out with an enhanced version of the inventory using real world driving emission factors and road measurement data taken from the London Atmospheric Emissions Inventory (LAEI). The measurement to inventory agreement was substantially improved using the enhanced version, showing the importance of fully accounting for road traffic, which is the dominant NOx emission source in London. In central London there was still an underestimation by the inventory of 30-40% compared with flux measurements, suggesting significant improvements are still required in the NOx emissions inventory.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454