Strategic Illusions: The Fallacies of Globalist Strategies to Mitigate Violence After 9/11

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter illuminates the disenchantment with one strategy of mitigation in the current era, that of counterinsurgency. The analysis show how policies of managing and mitigating the threat of mass violence stemmed from the manner in which the threat was defined and framed in political discourse, and how this in turn reflected a particular ideological worldview, not just in the United States but across what we might term the democratic West. That ideology is one that this chapter shall delineate as “globalism.” It was globalist ideas that were to inform much of the thinking that underpinned the initial identification of the nature of the threat and influence subsequent policy directions about how to manage that threat. It was also the paradoxes and incoherence in globalist influenced thinking that was also to lead to strategic mistakes and the subsequent disillusionment with much of the post-9/11 consensus.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMitigating Mass Violence and Managing Threats in Contemporary Society
EditorsGordon Crews, Mary Ann Markey, Selinia Kerr
Place of PublicationHershey, Pennsylvania
PublisherIGI Global
Chapter14
Pages242-257
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781799849582
ISBN (Print)9781799849575
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Strategic Illusions: The Fallacies of Globalist Strategies to Mitigate Violence After 9/11'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this