King's College London

Research portal

Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: Relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic : Relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey. / Lieberoth, Andreas; Lin, Shiang Yi; Stöckli, Sabrina; Han, Hyemin; Kowal, Marta; Gelpi, Rebekah; Chrona, Stavroula; Tran, Thao Phuong; Jeftić, Alma; Rasmussen, Jesper; Cakal, Huseyin; Milfont, Taciano L.

In: Royal Society open science, Vol. 8, No. 2, 200589, 02.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Lieberoth, A, Lin, SY, Stöckli, S, Han, H, Kowal, M, Gelpi, R, Chrona, S, Tran, TP, Jeftić, A, Rasmussen, J, Cakal, H & Milfont, TL 2021, 'Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: Relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey', Royal Society open science, vol. 8, no. 2, 200589. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200589

APA

Lieberoth, A., Lin, S. Y., Stöckli, S., Han, H., Kowal, M., Gelpi, R., Chrona, S., Tran, T. P., Jeftić, A., Rasmussen, J., Cakal, H., & Milfont, T. L. (2021). Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: Relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey. Royal Society open science, 8(2), [200589]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200589

Vancouver

Lieberoth A, Lin SY, Stöckli S, Han H, Kowal M, Gelpi R et al. Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: Relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey. Royal Society open science. 2021 Feb;8(2). 200589. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200589

Author

Lieberoth, Andreas ; Lin, Shiang Yi ; Stöckli, Sabrina ; Han, Hyemin ; Kowal, Marta ; Gelpi, Rebekah ; Chrona, Stavroula ; Tran, Thao Phuong ; Jeftić, Alma ; Rasmussen, Jesper ; Cakal, Huseyin ; Milfont, Taciano L. / Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic : Relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey. In: Royal Society open science. 2021 ; Vol. 8, No. 2.

Bibtex Download

@article{4a5229e1c6314526b5b4f8016cfaac57,
title = "Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: Relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey",
abstract = "The COVIDiSTRESS global survey collects data on early human responses to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic from 173 429 respondents in 48 countries. The open science study was co-designed by an international consortium of researchers to investigate how psychological responses differ across countries and cultures, and how this has impacted behaviour, coping and trust in government efforts to slow the spread of the virus. Starting in March 2020, COVIDiSTRESS leveraged the convenience of unpaid online recruitment to generate public data. The objective of the present analysis is to understand relationships between psychological responses in the early months of global coronavirus restrictions and help understand how different government measures succeed or fail in changing public behaviour. There were variations between and within countries. Although Western Europeans registered as more concerned over COVID-19, more stressed, and having slightly more trust in the governments' efforts, there was no clear geographical pattern in compliance with behavioural measures. Detailed plots illustrating between-countries differences are provided. Using both traditional and Bayesian analyses, we found that individuals who worried about getting sick worked harder to protect themselves and others. However, concern about the coronavirus itself did not account for all of the variances in experienced stress during the early months of COVID-19 restrictions. More alarmingly, such stress was associated with less compliance. Further, those most concerned over the coronavirus trusted in government measures primarily where policies were strict. While concern over a disease is a source of mental distress, other factors including strictness of protective measures, social support and personal lockdown conditions must also be taken into consideration to fully appreciate the psychological impact of COVID-19 and to understand why some people fail to follow behavioural guidelines intended to protect themselves and others from infection. The Stage 1 manuscript associated with this submission received in-principle acceptance (IPA) on 18 May 2020. Following IPA, the accepted Stage 1 version of the manuscript was preregistered on the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/g2t3b. This preregistration was performed prior to data analysis. ",
keywords = "compliance behaviour, COVID-19, social psychology, stress, trust, worry",
author = "Andreas Lieberoth and Lin, {Shiang Yi} and Sabrina St{\"o}ckli and Hyemin Han and Marta Kowal and Rebekah Gelpi and Stavroula Chrona and Tran, {Thao Phuong} and Alma Jefti{\'c} and Jesper Rasmussen and Huseyin Cakal and Milfont, {Taciano L.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1098/rsos.200589",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Royal Society open science",
issn = "2054-5703",
publisher = "The Royal Society",
number = "2",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic

T2 - Relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey

AU - Lieberoth, Andreas

AU - Lin, Shiang Yi

AU - Stöckli, Sabrina

AU - Han, Hyemin

AU - Kowal, Marta

AU - Gelpi, Rebekah

AU - Chrona, Stavroula

AU - Tran, Thao Phuong

AU - Jeftić, Alma

AU - Rasmussen, Jesper

AU - Cakal, Huseyin

AU - Milfont, Taciano L.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2021/2

Y1 - 2021/2

N2 - The COVIDiSTRESS global survey collects data on early human responses to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic from 173 429 respondents in 48 countries. The open science study was co-designed by an international consortium of researchers to investigate how psychological responses differ across countries and cultures, and how this has impacted behaviour, coping and trust in government efforts to slow the spread of the virus. Starting in March 2020, COVIDiSTRESS leveraged the convenience of unpaid online recruitment to generate public data. The objective of the present analysis is to understand relationships between psychological responses in the early months of global coronavirus restrictions and help understand how different government measures succeed or fail in changing public behaviour. There were variations between and within countries. Although Western Europeans registered as more concerned over COVID-19, more stressed, and having slightly more trust in the governments' efforts, there was no clear geographical pattern in compliance with behavioural measures. Detailed plots illustrating between-countries differences are provided. Using both traditional and Bayesian analyses, we found that individuals who worried about getting sick worked harder to protect themselves and others. However, concern about the coronavirus itself did not account for all of the variances in experienced stress during the early months of COVID-19 restrictions. More alarmingly, such stress was associated with less compliance. Further, those most concerned over the coronavirus trusted in government measures primarily where policies were strict. While concern over a disease is a source of mental distress, other factors including strictness of protective measures, social support and personal lockdown conditions must also be taken into consideration to fully appreciate the psychological impact of COVID-19 and to understand why some people fail to follow behavioural guidelines intended to protect themselves and others from infection. The Stage 1 manuscript associated with this submission received in-principle acceptance (IPA) on 18 May 2020. Following IPA, the accepted Stage 1 version of the manuscript was preregistered on the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/g2t3b. This preregistration was performed prior to data analysis.

AB - The COVIDiSTRESS global survey collects data on early human responses to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic from 173 429 respondents in 48 countries. The open science study was co-designed by an international consortium of researchers to investigate how psychological responses differ across countries and cultures, and how this has impacted behaviour, coping and trust in government efforts to slow the spread of the virus. Starting in March 2020, COVIDiSTRESS leveraged the convenience of unpaid online recruitment to generate public data. The objective of the present analysis is to understand relationships between psychological responses in the early months of global coronavirus restrictions and help understand how different government measures succeed or fail in changing public behaviour. There were variations between and within countries. Although Western Europeans registered as more concerned over COVID-19, more stressed, and having slightly more trust in the governments' efforts, there was no clear geographical pattern in compliance with behavioural measures. Detailed plots illustrating between-countries differences are provided. Using both traditional and Bayesian analyses, we found that individuals who worried about getting sick worked harder to protect themselves and others. However, concern about the coronavirus itself did not account for all of the variances in experienced stress during the early months of COVID-19 restrictions. More alarmingly, such stress was associated with less compliance. Further, those most concerned over the coronavirus trusted in government measures primarily where policies were strict. While concern over a disease is a source of mental distress, other factors including strictness of protective measures, social support and personal lockdown conditions must also be taken into consideration to fully appreciate the psychological impact of COVID-19 and to understand why some people fail to follow behavioural guidelines intended to protect themselves and others from infection. The Stage 1 manuscript associated with this submission received in-principle acceptance (IPA) on 18 May 2020. Following IPA, the accepted Stage 1 version of the manuscript was preregistered on the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/g2t3b. This preregistration was performed prior to data analysis.

KW - compliance behaviour

KW - COVID-19

KW - social psychology

KW - stress

KW - trust

KW - worry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101321119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rsos.200589

DO - 10.1098/rsos.200589

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85101321119

VL - 8

JO - Royal Society open science

JF - Royal Society open science

SN - 2054-5703

IS - 2

M1 - 200589

ER -

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454