Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks

Helen Elden, Henrik Hagberg, Anna Wessberg, Verena Sengpiel, Andreas Herbst, Maria Bullarbo, Christina Bergh, Kristian Bolin, Snezana Malbasic, Sissel Saltvedt, Olof Stephansson, Anna-Karin Wikström, Lars Ladfors, Ulla-Britt Wennerholm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)
150 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Observational data shows that postterm pregnancy (≥42 gestational weeks, GW) and late term pregnancy (≥41 GW), as compared to term pregnancy, is associated with an increased risk for adverse outcome for the mother and infant. Standard care in many countries is induction of labour at 42 GW. There is insufficient scientific support that induction of labour at 41 GW, as compared with expectant management and induction at 42 GW will reduce perinatal mortality and morbidity without an increase in operative deliveries, negative delivery experiences or higher costs. Large randomised studies are needed since important outcomes; such as perinatal mortality and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy are rare events.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this