Superficial supervision: are we placing clinicians and clients at risk?

Andrew Gardner; Helen McCutcheon; Maria Fedoruk

doi:10.5172/conu.2010.34.2.258

Superficial supervision: are we placing clinicians and clients at risk?

Andrew Gardner, Helen McCutcheon, Maria Fedoruk

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mental heath nurses recognise the importance of professional boundaries and therapeutic relationships and understand that clinical supervision is an important component to good clinical practice and their ongoing professional development. This qualitative constructivist grounded theory research has uncovered a potential risk in contemporary mental health clinical practice, where the desire for expedient answers may compromise the outcome of formal structured supervision. The notion of a new concept 'superficial supervision' and its implications for formal structured supervision are explored.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	258-266
Number of pages	9
Journal	Contemporary Nurse
Volume	34
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.2010.34.2.258
Publication status	Published - 2010

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.5172/conu.2010.34.2.258

Cite this

@article{35896bb860b94d368b294afab7f8dd6c,

title = "Superficial supervision: are we placing clinicians and clients at risk?",

abstract = "Mental heath nurses recognise the importance of professional boundaries and therapeutic relationships and understand that clinical supervision is an important component to good clinical practice and their ongoing professional development. This qualitative constructivist grounded theory research has uncovered a potential risk in contemporary mental health clinical practice, where the desire for expedient answers may compromise the outcome of formal structured supervision. The notion of a new concept 'superficial supervision' and its implications for formal structured supervision are explored.",

author = "Andrew Gardner and Helen McCutcheon and Maria Fedoruk",

year = "2010",

doi = "10.5172/conu.2010.34.2.258",

language = "English",

volume = "34",

pages = "258--266",

journal = "Contemporary Nurse",

issn = "1037-6178",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Superficial supervision

T2 - are we placing clinicians and clients at risk?

AU - Gardner, Andrew

AU - McCutcheon, Helen

AU - Fedoruk, Maria

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Mental heath nurses recognise the importance of professional boundaries and therapeutic relationships and understand that clinical supervision is an important component to good clinical practice and their ongoing professional development. This qualitative constructivist grounded theory research has uncovered a potential risk in contemporary mental health clinical practice, where the desire for expedient answers may compromise the outcome of formal structured supervision. The notion of a new concept 'superficial supervision' and its implications for formal structured supervision are explored.

AB - Mental heath nurses recognise the importance of professional boundaries and therapeutic relationships and understand that clinical supervision is an important component to good clinical practice and their ongoing professional development. This qualitative constructivist grounded theory research has uncovered a potential risk in contemporary mental health clinical practice, where the desire for expedient answers may compromise the outcome of formal structured supervision. The notion of a new concept 'superficial supervision' and its implications for formal structured supervision are explored.

U2 - 10.5172/conu.2010.34.2.258

DO - 10.5172/conu.2010.34.2.258

M3 - Article

C2 - 20509810

SN - 1037-6178

VL - 34

SP - 258

EP - 266

JO - Contemporary Nurse

JF - Contemporary Nurse

IS - 2

ER -

Superficial supervision: are we placing clinicians and clients at risk?

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this