TY - JOUR
T1 - Supporting Equity and Inclusion of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Individuals in Professional Organizations
AU - Huyck, Julia Jones
AU - Anbuhl, Kelsey L.
AU - Buran, Brad N.
AU - Adler, Henry J.
AU - Atcherson, Samuel R.
AU - Cakmak, Ozan
AU - Dwyer, Robert T.
AU - Eddolls, Morgan
AU - El May, Fadhel
AU - Fraenzer, Juergen Theodor
AU - Funkhouser, Rebekah
AU - Gagliardini, Mathilde
AU - Gallun, Frederick J.
AU - Goldsworthy, Raymond L.
AU - Gouin, Samir
AU - Heng, Joseph
AU - Hight, Ariel Edward
AU - Jawadi, Zina
AU - Kovacic, Damir
AU - Kumar, Rachit
AU - Kumar, Santosh
AU - Lim, Stacey R.
AU - Mo, Chengeng
AU - Nolan, Lisa S.
AU - Parbery-Clark, Alexandra
AU - Pisano, Dominic V.
AU - Rao, Valluri R.
AU - Raphael, Robert M.
AU - Reiss, Lina A.J.
AU - Spencer, Nathaniel J.
AU - Tang, Stephen J.
AU - Tejani, Viral D.
AU - Tran, Emma D.
AU - Valli, Mikaeel
AU - Watkins, Greg D.
AU - Wayne, Rachel V.
AU - Wheeler, Lindsey R.
AU - White, Stephanie L.
AU - Wong, Victor
AU - Yuk, M. Caroline
AU - Ratnanather, J. Tilak
AU - Steyger, Peter S.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Dr. Monita Chatterjee, Dr. Amanda Lauer, and the ARO council for their helpful comments on the manuscript.
Funding Information:
This article has described a highly successful model for promoting representation of D/HH individuals in hearing research. We have found that D/HH individuals have used their early career in hearing research, combined with mentorship from our group, as a stepping stone to other fields of study and medical specialties. This same support needs to be extended to inclusion of other disabilities, such as visual impairment, in their chosen field, and to the inclusion of D/HH individuals in STEMM fields beyond hearing research. Funding opportunities from the National Science Foundation (NSF 21-049, NSF 21-110) and the National Institutes of Health (R13, U13, R25) gives professional societies financial support to implement the five pillars, such as with conference costs (e.g., captioning) and mentoring activities.
Funding Information:
Of particular relevance to many professional societies that host meetings within the United States is the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA, 1990). The ADA prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities and requires that businesses open to the public, including nonprofit organizations, ensure that people with disabilities have equal access to all that they offer. The ADA typically applies to professional society meetings as they are open to the public (i.e., non-members can attend if they pay a registration fee) and are often partially funded by federal grants. Indeed, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) R13 and U13 funding mechanisms require that the proposal describe strategies for “involving the appropriate representation of women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in the planning and implementation of, and participation in, the proposed conference.” While the ADA requires equal access for these meetings, there is a difference between the professional society complying with the letter of the law, which places tremendous burden on the disabled individual to advocate for themselves and seek services and being proactive about reaching out to disabled attendees and securing accommodations for them. By being proactive about accommodations, professional societies can nurture and support diversity within their communities while avoiding potential conflicts between disabled individuals and conference management.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 Huyck, Anbuhl, Buran, Adler, Atcherson, Cakmak, Dwyer, Eddolls, El May, Fraenzer, Funkhouser, Gagliardini, Gallun, Goldsworthy, Gouin, Heng, Hight, Jawadi, Kovacic, Kumar, Kumar, Lim, Mo, Nolan, Parbery-Clark, Pisano, Rao, Raphael, Reiss, Spencer, Tang, Tejani, Tran, Valli, Watkins, Wayne, Wheeler, White, Wong, Yuk, Ratnanather and Steyger.
PY - 2021/10/15
Y1 - 2021/10/15
N2 - Disability is an important and often overlooked component of diversity. Individuals with disabilities bring a rare perspective to science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) because of their unique experiences approaching complex issues related to health and disability, navigating the healthcare system, creatively solving problems unfamiliar to many individuals without disabilities, managing time and resources that are limited by physical or mental constraints, and advocating for themselves and others in the disabled community. Yet, individuals with disabilities are underrepresented in STEMM. Professional organizations can address this underrepresentation by recruiting individuals with disabilities for leadership opportunities, easing financial burdens, providing equal access, fostering peer-mentor groups, and establishing a culture of equity and inclusion spanning all facets of diversity. We are a group of deaf and hard-of-hearing (D/HH) engineers, scientists, and clinicians, most of whom are active in clinical practice and/or auditory research. We have worked within our professional societies to improve access and inclusion for D/HH individuals and others with disabilities. We describe how different models of disability inform our understanding of disability as a form of diversity. We address heterogeneity within disabled communities, including intersectionality between disability and other forms of diversity. We highlight how the Association for Research in Otolaryngology has supported our efforts to reduce ableism and promote access and inclusion for D/HH individuals. We also discuss future directions and challenges. The tools and approaches discussed here can be applied by other professional organizations to include individuals with all forms of diversity in STEMM.
AB - Disability is an important and often overlooked component of diversity. Individuals with disabilities bring a rare perspective to science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) because of their unique experiences approaching complex issues related to health and disability, navigating the healthcare system, creatively solving problems unfamiliar to many individuals without disabilities, managing time and resources that are limited by physical or mental constraints, and advocating for themselves and others in the disabled community. Yet, individuals with disabilities are underrepresented in STEMM. Professional organizations can address this underrepresentation by recruiting individuals with disabilities for leadership opportunities, easing financial burdens, providing equal access, fostering peer-mentor groups, and establishing a culture of equity and inclusion spanning all facets of diversity. We are a group of deaf and hard-of-hearing (D/HH) engineers, scientists, and clinicians, most of whom are active in clinical practice and/or auditory research. We have worked within our professional societies to improve access and inclusion for D/HH individuals and others with disabilities. We describe how different models of disability inform our understanding of disability as a form of diversity. We address heterogeneity within disabled communities, including intersectionality between disability and other forms of diversity. We highlight how the Association for Research in Otolaryngology has supported our efforts to reduce ableism and promote access and inclusion for D/HH individuals. We also discuss future directions and challenges. The tools and approaches discussed here can be applied by other professional organizations to include individuals with all forms of diversity in STEMM.
KW - disability
KW - Diversity & Inclusion
KW - hearing loss
KW - peer mentoring
KW - professional organisations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119040855&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/feduc.2021.755457
DO - 10.3389/feduc.2021.755457
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85119040855
SN - 2504-284X
VL - 6
JO - Frontiers in Education
JF - Frontiers in Education
M1 - 755457
ER -