King's College London

Research portal

Survey to explore understanding of the principles of aseptic technique: Qualitative content analysis with descriptive analysis of confidence and training

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dinah J. Gould, Jane Chudleigh, Edward Purssell, Clare Hawker, Sarah Gaze, Deborah James, Mary Lynch, Nicola Pope, Nicholas Drey

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-396
JournalAmerican Journal of Infection Control
Early online date21 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

Background

In many countries, aseptic procedures are undertaken by nurses in the general ward setting, but variation in practice has been reported, and evidence indicates that the principles underpinning aseptic technique are not well understood.

Methods

A survey was conducted, employing a brief, purpose-designed, self-reported questionnaire.

Results

The response rate was 72%. Of those responding, 65% of nurses described aseptic technique in terms of the procedure used to undertake it, and 46% understood the principles of asepsis. The related concepts of cleanliness and sterilization were frequently confused with one another. Additionally, 72% reported that they not had received training for at least 5 years; 92% were confident of their ability to apply aseptic technique; and 90% reported that they had not been reassessed since their initial training. Qualitative analysis confirmed a lack of clarity about the meaning of aseptic technique.

Conclusion

Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique and the concepts of sterility and cleanliness is inadequate, a finding in line with results of previous studies. This knowledge gap potentially places patients at risk. Nurses' understanding of the principles of asepsis could be improved. Further studies should establish the generalizability of the study findings. Possible improvements include renewed emphasis during initial nurse education, greater opportunity for updating knowledge and skills post-qualification, and audit of practice.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454