Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: A critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

Madeleine Pownall, Flávio Azevedo, Laura M König, Hannah R Slack, Zoe Flack, Sandra Grinschgl, Mahmoud M Elsherif, Katie A Gilligan-Lee, Catia M F de Oliveira, Biljana Gjoneska, Tamara Kalandadze, Katherine Button, Sarah Ashcroft-Jones, Jenny Terry, Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir, Filip Děchtěrenko, Shilaan Alzahawi, Bradley J Baker, Merle-Marie Pittelkow, Lydia RiedlKathleen Schmidt, Charlotte R Pennington, John J Shaw, Timo Lüke, Matthew C Makel, Helena Hartmann, Mirela Zaneva, Daniel Walker, Steven Verheyen, Daniel Cox, Jennifer Mattschey, Tom Gallagher-Mitchell, Peter Branney, Yanna Weisberg, Kamil Izydorczak, Ali H Al-Hoorie, Ann-Marie Creaven, Suzanne L K Stewart, Kai Krautter, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Samuel J Westwood, Patricia Arriaga, Meng Liu, Myriam A Baum, Tobias Wingen, Robert M Ross, Aoife O'Mahony, Agata Bochynska, Michelle Jamieson, Myrthe Vel Tromp, Siu Kit Yeung, Martin R Vasilev, Amélie Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Leticia Micheli, Markus Konkol, David Moreau, James E Bartlett, Kait Clark, Gwen Brekelmans, Theofilos Gkinopoulos, Samantha L Tyler, Jan Philipp Röer, Zlatomira G Ilchovska, Christopher R Madan, Olly Robertson, Bethan J Iley, Samuel Guay, Martina Sladekova, Shanu Sadhwani, Forrt

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)


In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (i) students' scientific literacies (i.e. students' understanding of open research, consumption of science and the development of transferable skills); (ii) student engagement (i.e. motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration and engagement in open research) and (iii) students' attitudes towards science (i.e. trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship.
Original languageEnglish
Article number221255
Pages (from-to)221255
Number of pages1
JournalRoyal Society open science
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2023


  • higher education
  • open research
  • open scholarship
  • open science
  • pedagogy
  • teaching


Dive into the research topics of 'Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: A critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this