Telemedicine for peer-to-peer psychiatry learning between U.K. and Somaliland medical students

Roxanne Keynejad*, Faisal R Ali, Alexander E T Finlayson, Jibriil Handuleh, Gudon Adam, Jordan S T Bowen, Andrew Leather, Simon J Little, Susannah Whitwell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)
282 Downloads (Pure)



The proportion of U.K. medical students applying for psychiatry training continues to decline, whereas, in Somaliland, there are no public-sector psychiatrists. This pilot study assessed the usefulness and feasibility of online, instant messenger, peer-to-peer exchange for psychiatry education between cultures.


Twenty medical students from King’s College, London, and Hargeisa University (Somaliland) met online in pairs every 2 weeks to discuss prearranged psychiatric topics, clinical cases, and treatment options, completing online evaluations throughout.


Average ratings of the enjoyment, academic helpfulness, and interest of sessions were 4.31, 3.56, and 4.54 (of a maximum of 5), respectively; 83% would recommend the partnership to a friend.


This partnership enabled students on both sides to exploit psychiatry-learning resources at the other’s disposal, outside the standard medical education context, illustrating the benefits to medical students in dramatically different locations of partnership through telemedicine. This pilot study presents an innovative, cost-effective, under-used approach to international medical education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-186
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic psychiatry
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2013


  • Adult
  • Djibouti
  • Education, Medical, Undergraduate
  • Female
  • Great Britain
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Peer Group
  • Pilot Projects
  • Psychiatry
  • Students, Medical
  • Telemedicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Telemedicine for peer-to-peer psychiatry learning between U.K. and Somaliland medical students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this