Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
Hannah Murray, Nick Grey, Emma Warnock-Parkes, Alice Kerr, Jennifer Wild, David M. Clark, Anke Ehlers
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e33 |
Journal | Cognitive Behaviour Therapist |
Volume | 15 |
DOIs | |
Published | 22 Jul 2022 |
Additional links |
Therapist cognitions about trauma-focused psychological therapies can affect our implementation of evidence-based therapies for post-Traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), potentially reducing their effectiveness. Based on observations gleaned from teaching and supervising one of these treatments, cognitive therapy for PTSD (CT-PTSD), ten common 'misconceptions' were identified. These included misconceptions about the suitability of the treatment for some types of trauma and/or emotions, the need for stabilisation prior to memory work, the danger of 'retraumatising' patients with memory-focused work, the risks of using memory-focused techniques with patients who dissociate, the remote use of trauma-focused techniques, and the perception of trauma-focused CBT as inflexible. In this article, these misconceptions are analysed in light of existing evidence and guidance is provided on using trauma-focused CT-PTSD with a broad range of presentations. Key learning aims (1) To recognise common misconceptions about trauma-focused CBT for PTSD and the evidence against them. (2) To widen understanding of the application of cognitive therapy for PTSD (CT-PTSD) to a broad range of presentations. (3) To increase confidence in the formulation-driven, flexible, active and creative delivery of CT-PTSD.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454