King's College London

Research portal

Testing times ahead: Non-invasive prenatal testing and the kind of community we want to be

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roger Brownsword, Jeff Wale

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)646-672
Number of pages27
JournalModern Law Review
Volume81
Issue number4
Early online date4 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 Jul 2018

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

This article reviews the Nuffield Council on Bioethics’ report on Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT); and introduces two general questions provoked by the report – concerning, respectively, the nature and extent of the informational interests that are to be recognised in today’s ‘information societies’ and the membership of today’s ‘genetic societies’. The article also considers the role and nature of the Nuffield Council. While the Council’s report identifies a range of individual and collective interests that are relevant to determining the legitimate uses of NIPT, we argue that it should put these interests into an order of importance; we sketch how this might be done; and we suggest that, failing such a prioritisation of interests, the Council should present its reflections in a way that engages public debate around a number of options rather than making firm recommendations.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454