The art of the Trump-Iran deal: An unsuccessful coercive foreign policy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The success of a state's coercive foreign policy depends on how much influence it has over a ‘target’ – a premise that assumes other factors do not obstruct the policy goal. In practice however, the nature of the international system complicates the potential for such a policy's success. This paper examines this idea using the 2018 US decision that aimed to dismantle the JCPOA by pulling out of the agreement and re-sanctioning Iran. To do so, this paper engages with the general and region-specific literature on coercive foreign policy, sets out a background of US-Iranian ties and examines the consensus-driven momentum that led to the JCPOA, along with the unilateral 2018 US decision to renege on the agreement. The findings demonstrate how the US and Iranian political environments made it difficult to realise the coercive foreign policy goal of dismantling the JCPOA. The reasons for this centre on the notion that the interconnected nature of the international system diminishes the effectiveness of this type of coercive foreign policy – even when considering the USA as a powerful implementer of this policy. Thus, I argue for the importance of capturing contextual factors when considering this type of international relations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234-246
Number of pages13
JournalGlobal Policy
Volume15
Issue number2
Early online date24 Jan 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The art of the Trump-Iran deal: An unsuccessful coercive foreign policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this