Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5-26 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | European Journal of Analytic Philosophy |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 31 Oct 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| E-pub ahead of print | 31 Oct 2021 |
| Published | 2021 |
| Additional links |
I respond to the 4 commentaries by Awais Aftab & Kristopher Nielsen (A&N), Hane Htut Maung (HHM), Diane O'Leary (DO'L) and Kathryn Tabb (KT) under 3 main headings: “What is the BPSM really?” & Why update it?; “Is our approach foundationally compromised?”, and finally, “Antagonists or fellow travellers?”.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454