The commercialisation of equity

Man Yip, James Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
634 Downloads (Pure)


This article analyses the jurisprudence on the relevance of the commercial context to principles of the law of equity and trusts. We criticise recent UK Supreme Court decisions in the area (chiefly Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria, FHR European Ventures v Cedar Capital Partners and AIB Group v Mark Redler & Co) and identify a trend of the ‘commercialisation’ of the issues. The cases are placed in comparative context and it is argued that there is an unsatisfactory pattern of judicial reasoning, exhibiting a preference for some degree of unarticulated flexibility in commercial adjudication. But the price of that flexibility is a lack of doctrinal coherence and development of equitable principles which will apply in, and beyond, the commercial context. We also argue that this trend has important implications for the coming rounds of Supreme Court appointments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)647-671
JournalLegal Studies
Issue number4
Early online date16 May 2017
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2017


  • Equity
  • Trusts
  • Supreme Court


Dive into the research topics of 'The commercialisation of equity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this