The complexities of the diet-microbiome relationship: advances and perspectives

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Personalised dietary modulation of the gut microbiota may be key to disease management. Current investigations provide a broad understanding of the impact of diet on the composition and activity of the gut microbiota, yet detailed knowledge in applying diet as an actionable tool remains limited. Further to the relative novelty of the field, approaches are yet to be standardised and extremely heterogeneous research outcomes have ensued. This may be related to confounders associated with complexities in capturing an accurate representation of both diet and the gut microbiota. This review discusses the intricacies and current methodologies of diet-microbial relations, the implications and limitations of these investigative approaches, and future considerations that may assist in accelerating applications. New investigations should consider improved collection of dietary data, further characterisation of mechanistic interactions, and an increased focus on -omic technologies such as metabolomics to describe the bacterial and metabolic activity of food degradation, together with its crosstalk with the host. Furthermore, clinical evidence with health outcomes is required before therapeutic dietary strategies for microbial amelioration can be made. The potential to reach detailed understanding of diet-microbiota relations may depend on re-evaluation, progression, and unification of research methodologies, which consider the complexities of these interactions.
Original languageEnglish
Article number10
Pages (from-to)10
JournalGenome medicine
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • Personalised nutrition
  • gut microbiome
  • diet
  • research methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The complexities of the diet-microbiome relationship: advances and perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this