Abstract
One of the distinctive features of the obligation to obey the law is its content-independence. We ought to do what the law commands because the law commands it, and not because of the law?s content--i.e., the independent merits of the actions it prescribes. Despite its popularity, the notion of content-independence is marked by ambiguity. In this paper, I first clarify what content-independence is. I then develop a simple test--the ?content-independence test?--that allows us to establish whether any candidate justification of the obligation to obey the law delivers genuine content-independence. I apply this test to prominent such justifications and conclude that several of them, surprisingly, fail it.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 135-157 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | LEGAL THEORY |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 16 Aug 2018 |