The Counterrevolution in Strategic Affairs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Claims from the 19905 about a revolution or transformation in military affairs are assessed in light of the experience of the 20 0 os in Iraq and Afghanistan. The importance of considering political as well as militaty affairs is stressed. Though the United States developed evident predominance in capabilities for regular war, it was caught out when drawn into irregular forms of warfare, such as terrorism and insurgency. The United States significantly improved its counterinsurgency capabilities. It does not follow, however, that the United States will now engage more in irregular conflicts. Indeed, the military circumstances of the past decade were in many ways unique and led to an exaggeration of the strategic value of irregular forms and the need for the United States to respond. Meanwhile, the political legacy of the experience is likely to be a more limited engagement with the problems associated with "failed" and "rogue" states.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16 - 32
Number of pages17
JournalDaedalus
Volume140
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Counterrevolution in Strategic Affairs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this