Abstract
This chapter presents a critical approach towards the role that many courts are assuming in the protection of socio-economical rights in the Latin American context. It argues that the proper role of courts must necessarily vary according to the formulation of the social right in question. As a general rule, the more absolute and specifically formulated the right - or its corresponding obligation - the higher the institutional competence (legitimacy and competency) of courts will tend to be, and vice versa. When obligations are stated in vague fashion, such as the right to housing, health, and education in Colombia, Brazil, and South Africa, the room left for interpreting contending definitions is not only ample, but it often involves the intractable question of social policy design that must be studied by the executive and legislative branches. The chapter then contends that courts should play, at most, a complementary role. It invites courts to take more creative approaches in the enforcement of socio-economic rights.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Constitutionalism |
| Subtitle of host publication | Old Dilemmas, New Insights |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Pages | 202-236 |
| Number of pages | 35 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780192896759 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Courts
- Institutional competence
- Latin america
- Obligations
- Social policy design
- Socio-economical rights
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Court’s Dilemma in Social Rights’ Enforcement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver