Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Court’s Dilemma in Social Rights’ Enforcement

  • King's College London

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter presents a critical approach towards the role that many courts are assuming in the protection of socio-economical rights in the Latin American context. It argues that the proper role of courts must necessarily vary according to the formulation of the social right in question. As a general rule, the more absolute and specifically formulated the right - or its corresponding obligation - the higher the institutional competence (legitimacy and competency) of courts will tend to be, and vice versa. When obligations are stated in vague fashion, such as the right to housing, health, and education in Colombia, Brazil, and South Africa, the room left for interpreting contending definitions is not only ample, but it often involves the intractable question of social policy design that must be studied by the executive and legislative branches. The chapter then contends that courts should play, at most, a complementary role. It invites courts to take more creative approaches in the enforcement of socio-economic rights.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationConstitutionalism
Subtitle of host publicationOld Dilemmas, New Insights
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages202-236
Number of pages35
ISBN (Electronic)9780192896759
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Keywords

  • Courts
  • Institutional competence
  • Latin america
  • Obligations
  • Social policy design
  • Socio-economical rights

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Court’s Dilemma in Social Rights’ Enforcement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this