TY - JOUR
T1 - The developing brain structural and functional connectome fingerprint
AU - Ciarrusta Monzon, Judit
AU - Christiaens, Daan
AU - Fitzgibbon, Sean
AU - Dimitrova, Ralica
AU - Hutter, Jana
AU - Hughes, Emer
AU - Duff, Eugene P.
AU - Price, Anthony
AU - Cordero-Grande, Lucilio
AU - Tournier, Jacques-Donald
AU - Rueckert, Daniel
AU - Hajnal, Jo
AU - Arichi, Tomoki
AU - McAlonan, Grainne
AU - Edwards, David
AU - Batalle, Dafnis
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007–2013)/ ERC Grant Agreement no. 319456 . The authors acknowledge infrastructure support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre ( BRC ) at South London, Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust , King's College London and the NIHR-BRC at Guys and St Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust ( GSTFT ). The authors also acknowledge support in part from the Wellcome Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council ( EPSRC ) Centre for Medical Engineering at King’s College London [WT 203148/Z/16/Z ] and the Medical Research Council (UK) [ MR/K006355/1 ]. Additional sources of support included the Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment at King’s College London, the European Autism Interventions ( EU-AIMS ) trial and the EU AIMS-2-TRIALS , a European Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under Grant agreements nos. 115300 and 777394 , the resources of which are composed of financial contributions from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (Grant FP7/2007–2013 ). DC is supported by the Flemish Research Foundation (FWO, fellowship [ 12ZV420N ]). TA is supported by a MRC Clinician Scientist Fellowship [ MR/P008712/1 ]. DE received support from the Medical Research Council Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London [ MR/N026063/1 ]. DB received support from a Wellcome Trust Seed Award in Science [ 217316/Z/19/Z ]. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - In the mature brain, structural and functional ‘fingerprints’ of brain connectivity can be used to identify the uniqueness of an individual. However, whether the characteristics that make a given brain distinguishable from others already exist at birth remains unknown. Here, we used neuroimaging data from the developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) of preterm born neonates who were scanned twice during the perinatal period to assess the developing brain fingerprint. We found that 62% of the participants could be identified based on the congruence of the later structural connectome to the initial connectivity matrix derived from the earlier timepoint. In contrast, similarity between functional connectomes of the same subject at different time points was low. Only 10% of the participants showed greater self-similarity in comparison to self-to-other-similarity for the functional connectome. These results suggest that structural connectivity is more stable in early life and can represent a potential connectome fingerprint of the individual: a relatively stable structural connectome appears to support a changing functional connectome at a time when neonates must rapidly acquire new skills to adapt to their new environment.
AB - In the mature brain, structural and functional ‘fingerprints’ of brain connectivity can be used to identify the uniqueness of an individual. However, whether the characteristics that make a given brain distinguishable from others already exist at birth remains unknown. Here, we used neuroimaging data from the developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) of preterm born neonates who were scanned twice during the perinatal period to assess the developing brain fingerprint. We found that 62% of the participants could be identified based on the congruence of the later structural connectome to the initial connectivity matrix derived from the earlier timepoint. In contrast, similarity between functional connectomes of the same subject at different time points was low. Only 10% of the participants showed greater self-similarity in comparison to self-to-other-similarity for the functional connectome. These results suggest that structural connectivity is more stable in early life and can represent a potential connectome fingerprint of the individual: a relatively stable structural connectome appears to support a changing functional connectome at a time when neonates must rapidly acquire new skills to adapt to their new environment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132451337&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101117
DO - 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101117
M3 - Article
SN - 1878-9293
VL - 55
JO - Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
JF - Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
M1 - 101117
ER -