Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Christopher Vine, Sarah Coakley, Stephen Myers, Sam Blacker, Oliver Runswick
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e15 |
Journal | Experimental Results |
Volume | 3 |
Early online date | 24 Aug 2022 |
DOIs | |
Accepted/In press | 15 Aug 2022 |
E-pub ahead of print | 24 Aug 2022 |
Published | 24 Aug 2022 |
Additional links |
The development, and day-to-day_VINE_Publishedonline24August2022_GOLD VoR (CC BY)
The_development_and_day_to_day_VINE_Publishedonline24August2022_GOLD_VoR_CC_BY_.pdf, 344 KB, application/pdf
Uploaded date:26 Sep 2022
Version:Final published version
Licence:CC BY
During military operations, soldiers are required to successfully complete numerous physical and cognitive tasks concurrently. Understanding the typical variance in research tools that may be used to provide insight into the interrelationship between physical and cognitive performance is therefore highly important. This study assessed the inter-day variability of two military-specific cognitive assessments: A Military-Specific Auditory N-Back Task (MSANT) and a Shoot-/Don't-Shoot Task (SDST) in 28 participants. Limits of agreement ±95% confidence intervals, standard error of the mean, and smallest detectable change were calculated to quantify the typical variance in task performance. All parameters within the MSANT and SDST demonstrated no mean difference for trial visit in either the seated or walking condition, with equivalency demonstrated for the majority of comparisons. Collectively, these data provided an indication of the typical variance in MSANT and SDST performance, while demonstrating that both assessments can be used during seated and walking conditions.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454