The development and validation of the Questionnaire on Anticipated Discrimination (QUAD)

Jheanell Gabbidon*, Elaine Brohan, Sarah Clement, R. Claire Henderson, Graham Thornicroft, MIRIAD Study Grp

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)


Background: The anticipation of mental health-related discrimination is common amongst people with mental health problems and can have serious adverse effects. This study aimed to develop and validate a measure assessing the extent to which people with mental health problems anticipate that they will personally experience discrimination across a range of contexts.

Methods: The items and format for the Questionnaire on Anticipated Discrimination (QUAD) were developed from previous versions of the Discrimination and Stigma Scale (DISC), focus groups and cognitive debriefing interviews which were used to further refine the content and format. The resulting provisional version of the QUAD was completed by 117 service users in an online survey and reliability, validity, precision and acceptability were assessed. A final version of the scale was agreed and analyses re-run using the online survey data and data from an independent sample to report the psychometric properties of the finalised scale.

Results: The provisional version of the QUAD had 17 items, good internal consistency (alpha = 0.86) and adequate convergent validity as supported by the significant positive correlations with the Stigma Scale (SS) (r = 0.40, p <0.001) and the Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI) (r = 0.40, p <0.001). Three items were removed due to low endorsements, high inter-correlation or conceptual concerns. The finalised 14 item QUAD had good internal consistency (alpha = 0.86), good test re-test reliability (rho(c) = 0.81) and adequate convergent validity: correlations with the ISMI (r = 0.45, p <0.001) and with the SS (r = 0.39, p <0.001). Reading ease scores indicated good acceptability for general adult populations. Cross-replication in an independent sample further indicated good internal consistency (alpha = 0.88), adequate convergent validity and revealed two factors summarised by institutions/services and interpersonal/professional relationships.

Conclusions: The QUAD expanded upon previous versions of the DISC. It is a reliable, valid and acceptable measure which can be used to identify key life areas in which people may personally anticipate discrimination, and an overall tendency to anticipate discrimination. It may also be useful in planning interventions aimed at reducing the stigma of mental illness.

Original languageEnglish
Article number297
Pages (from-to)N/A
Number of pages14
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Issue numberN/A
Publication statusPublished - 7 Nov 2013


  • Measure
  • Anticipate
  • Discrimination
  • Stigma
  • Psychometric
  • Acknowledged-BRC
  • Acknowledged-BRC-13/14


Dive into the research topics of 'The development and validation of the Questionnaire on Anticipated Discrimination (QUAD)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this