The effect of five kinds of surface treatment agents on the bond strength to various ceramics with thermocycle aging

Yukari Noda, Masatoshi Nakajima*, Masahiro Takahashi, Teerapong Mamanee, Keiichi Hosaka, Tomohiro Takagaki, Masaomi Ikeda, Richard M. Foxton, Junji Tagami

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of ceramic surface treatment agents on shear bond strengths to ceramic materials with and without thermocycling. Ceramic plates were prepared from feldspathic ceramic; AAA, lithium disilicate ceramic material; IPS e.max Press, zirconia ceramic; Lava. Ceramic surfaces were pretreated with one of five surface treatment agents (Clearfil PhotoBond mixed with Porcelainbond activator (PB), Clearfil SE One mixed with Porcelainbond activator (SO), Ceramic Primer (CP), Universal Primer (UP), Scotchbond Universal (SU)), and then a resin cement (Clapearl DC) was filled. After 0, 5,000, and 10,000 thermocycles, micro-shear bond strengths between ceramic-cement interfaces were determined. SU exhibited significantly lower initial bond strength to AAA and e.max than PB, SO, CP, and UP. For Lava, PB, SO, CP and SU exhibited higher initial bond strengths than UP. Thermocycles reduced bond strengths to all the ceramic materials with any surface treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberJST.JSTAGE/dmj/2016-383
Pages (from-to)755-761
Number of pages7
JournalDental Materials Journal
Volume36
Issue number6
Early online date12 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Nov 2017

Keywords

  • Ceramic materials
  • Ceramic surface treatment agents
  • Micro-shear bond strength
  • Thermocycle aging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of five kinds of surface treatment agents on the bond strength to various ceramics with thermocycle aging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this