The effectiveness of Google GLASS as a vital signs monitor in surgery: A simulation study

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effectiveness of Google GLASS as a vital signs monitor in surgery

T2 - A simulation study

AU - Iqbal, Mohammed Husnain

AU - Aydin, Abdullatif

AU - Lowdon, Alexandra

AU - Ahmed, Hamza Ibn

AU - Muir, Gordon H

AU - Khan, M Shamim

AU - Dasgupta, Prokar

AU - Ahmed, Kamran

N1 - Copyright © 2016 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - INTRODUCTION: To assess the effectiveness of the Google GLASS as a vital signs monitor in a surgical setting and identify potential uses.METHODS: This prospective, observational and comparative study recruited novice (n = 24), intermediate (n = 8) and expert urologists (n = 5). All candidates performed a procedure on the GreenLight Simulator within a simulated setting using a standard vital signs monitor and then the Google GLASS. The time taken to respond to abnormal vital signs during both sessions was recorded. A quantitative survey was used to assess the usability and acceptability of the Google GLASS surgery.RESULTS: The majority (84%) of participants responded quicker to abnormal signs with the Google GLASS compared to a standard monitor (p = 0.0267). The average simulation score during a standard-monitor and GLASS-session scored to be statistically insignificant (p = 0.253). All parameters of simulation were also similar in both sessions including average sweep speed (p = 0.594), average blood loss (p = 0.761) and average grams vaporised (p = 0.102).DISCUSSION: Surgical performance between both sessions was similar and not hampered by the use of Google GLASS. Furthermore, 81% of candidates stated the GLASS was comfortable to wear during the procedure.CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that head-mounted displays such as the Google GLASS are potentially useful in surgery to aid patient care without hampering the surgeons view. It is hoped that the innovation and evolution of these devices triggers the potential future application of such devices within the medical field.

AB - INTRODUCTION: To assess the effectiveness of the Google GLASS as a vital signs monitor in a surgical setting and identify potential uses.METHODS: This prospective, observational and comparative study recruited novice (n = 24), intermediate (n = 8) and expert urologists (n = 5). All candidates performed a procedure on the GreenLight Simulator within a simulated setting using a standard vital signs monitor and then the Google GLASS. The time taken to respond to abnormal vital signs during both sessions was recorded. A quantitative survey was used to assess the usability and acceptability of the Google GLASS surgery.RESULTS: The majority (84%) of participants responded quicker to abnormal signs with the Google GLASS compared to a standard monitor (p = 0.0267). The average simulation score during a standard-monitor and GLASS-session scored to be statistically insignificant (p = 0.253). All parameters of simulation were also similar in both sessions including average sweep speed (p = 0.594), average blood loss (p = 0.761) and average grams vaporised (p = 0.102).DISCUSSION: Surgical performance between both sessions was similar and not hampered by the use of Google GLASS. Furthermore, 81% of candidates stated the GLASS was comfortable to wear during the procedure.CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that head-mounted displays such as the Google GLASS are potentially useful in surgery to aid patient care without hampering the surgeons view. It is hoped that the innovation and evolution of these devices triggers the potential future application of such devices within the medical field.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.013

DO - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 27833004

SN - 1743-9191

VL - 36

SP - 293

EP - 297

JO - International Journal Of Surgery

JF - International Journal Of Surgery

IS - Pt A

ER -