Abstract
Climate change and biodiversity loss have become increasingly prominent in recent years. To evaluate these two issues, prediction models have been developed on the basis of ecological-niche (or climate‐envelope) models. However, the spatial scale and extent of the underlying environmental data are known to affect results. To verify whether the difference in the modelled spatial extent will affect model results, this study uses the MaxEnt model to predict the suitability range of giant pandas in the Min Mountain System (MMS) area through modelling performed (1) at a nationwide scale and (2) at a restricted MMS extent. The results show that, firstly, both models performed well in terms of accuracy. Secondly, extending the modelling extent does help improve the modelling results when the distribution data is incomplete. Thirdly, when environmental information is insufficient, the qualitative analysis should be combined with quantitative analysis to ensure the accuracy and practicality of the research. Finally, when predicting a suitability distribution of giant pandas, the modelling results under different spatial extents can provide management agencies at the various administrative levels with more targeted giant panda protective measures.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 11707 |
Journal | Sustainability (Switzerland) |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 21 |
Early online date | 22 Oct 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2021 |
Keywords
- Ailuropoda melanoleuca
- Ecological niche
- MaxEnt model
- Min mountain system
- Spatial extent