Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Pablo Ibáñez Colomo, Andriani Kalintiri
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 321-372 |
Number of pages | 52 |
Journal | Modern Law Review |
Volume | 83 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 29 Jan 2020 |
DOIs | |
Accepted/In press | 10 Sep 2019 |
E-pub ahead of print | 29 Jan 2020 |
Published | 1 Mar 2020 |
Additional links |
Ibanez Colomo and Kalintiri - The Evolution of EU Antitrust Policy (MLR)
Ibanez_Colomo_and_Kalintiri_The_Evolution_of_EU_Antitrust_Policy_MLR_.pdf, 1.56 MB, application/pdf
Uploaded date:11 May 2020
Version:Final published version
This article describes, and puts in context, the evolution of the enforcement practice of the European Commission in the area of EU antitrust law (Articles 101 and 102 TFEU). It considers all formal decisions adopted in the period between 1966 – when the European Court of Justice delivered the two seminal rulings that marked the discipline – and the end of 2017. The article classifies Commission decisions in accordance with four enforcement paradigms. The descriptive statistics show that the cases that the Commission chooses to prioritise have changed over the years. First, enforcement has progressively moved towards the core and the outer boundaries of the system. Second, it has become policy-driven rather than law-driven. Third, the nature of the cases chosen by the Commission is consistent with its commitment to a ‘more economics-based approach’ to enforcement. Finally, these cases signal a move towards a more ambitious stage in the process of the integration of Member States’ economies.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454