TY - JOUR
T1 - The factor structure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in schoolchildren
AU - Arildskov, Trine Wigh
AU - Virring, Anne
AU - Lambek, Rikke
AU - Carlsen, Anders Helles
AU - Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J.S.
AU - Østergaard, Søren D.
AU - Thomsen, Per Hove
N1 - Funding Information:
The project was funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant number: NNF15OC0017706 ); the Lundbeck Foundation (grant number: R208-2015-3329 ); the A.P. Møller Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Science (grant number: 15-15 ); the Research Foundation for the Center for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry , Central Denmark Region ( BUC16-TWA, BUC17-TWA ); the Graduate School of Health at Aarhus University (no grant number); the Psychiatric Research Foundation for the Central Denmark Region (no grant number); the Riisfort Foundation (no grant number); and the Brødrene Hartmanns Foundation (grant number: R69-A28284-B23205 ). Rikke Lambek has received research support from Fru C. Hermansens Mindelegat (grant number: 962-0001 ) and TrygFonden (grant number: 151504 ). Søren D. Østergaard is supported by grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant number: NNF20SA0062874 ), the Lundbeck Foundation (grant numbers: R358-2020-2341 and R344-2020-1073 ), The Danish Cancer Society ( R283-A16461 ), and Independent Research Fund Denmark (grant number: 7016-00048B ). The funders had no involvement in the design of the study; the data collection; the statistical analyses and interpretation of the results; or the writing and approval of and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Most studies support a bifactor model of childhood ADHD with two specific factors. However, several studies have not compared this model with a bifactor model with three specific factors, few have tested the actual strength of the factors, and none have examined whether "talks excessively" should be treated as a hyperactivity versus impulsivity symptom in children with ADHD. AIMS: To examine the factor structure of ADHD symptoms and evaluate the relative strength of potential factors. METHODS: Parent-reports on the ADHD-Rating Scale (ADHD-RS-IV) were collected for 2044 schoolchildren from the general population and 147 children with ADHD from a clinical sample. Single-, two- and three-(correlated and bi-)factor models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: Most models had a satisfactory fit. However, a correlated three-factor model where "talks excessively" was included as an indicator of impulsivity, and especially a bifactor model with one strong, well-defined general and two/three (ICD-10 defined) weak specific factors fit the data slightly better than the remaining models. CONCLUSIONS: The factor structure is best characterized by a bifactor model with a strong general factor and two/three weaker specific factors. Therefore, we suggest emphasizing the ADHD-RS-IV total score rather than the subscale scores in clinical practice.
AB - BACKGROUND: Most studies support a bifactor model of childhood ADHD with two specific factors. However, several studies have not compared this model with a bifactor model with three specific factors, few have tested the actual strength of the factors, and none have examined whether "talks excessively" should be treated as a hyperactivity versus impulsivity symptom in children with ADHD. AIMS: To examine the factor structure of ADHD symptoms and evaluate the relative strength of potential factors. METHODS: Parent-reports on the ADHD-Rating Scale (ADHD-RS-IV) were collected for 2044 schoolchildren from the general population and 147 children with ADHD from a clinical sample. Single-, two- and three-(correlated and bi-)factor models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: Most models had a satisfactory fit. However, a correlated three-factor model where "talks excessively" was included as an indicator of impulsivity, and especially a bifactor model with one strong, well-defined general and two/three (ICD-10 defined) weak specific factors fit the data slightly better than the remaining models. CONCLUSIONS: The factor structure is best characterized by a bifactor model with a strong general factor and two/three weaker specific factors. Therefore, we suggest emphasizing the ADHD-RS-IV total score rather than the subscale scores in clinical practice.
KW - ADHD
KW - ADHD-RS
KW - Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
KW - Bifactor model
KW - Children
KW - Confirmatory factor analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129778837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104220
DO - 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104220
M3 - Article
C2 - 35462238
AN - SCOPUS:85129778837
SN - 1873-3379
VL - 125
SP - 104220
JO - Research in developmental disabilities
JF - Research in developmental disabilities
M1 - 104220
ER -