The historiography of a profession: The societal and political drivers of the health information management profession in Australia

Kerin Robinson; Simon Barraclough; Elizabeth Cummings; Rick Iedema

doi:10.1177/18333583211070336

The historiography of a profession: The societal and political drivers of the health information management profession in Australia

Kerin Robinson^*, Simon Barraclough, Elizabeth Cummings, Rick Iedema

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Health information permeates healthcare delivery from point-of-care, across the continuum of care and throughout the healthcare system’s policy, population health, research, planning and funding arenas. Health information managers (HIMs) expertly manage that information. This commentary theorises the health information management profession for the first time. Its purpose is to identify and contextualise, via a historiographical account, the societal and political drivers that have shaped contemporary Australian health information management and HIMs’ scientific work. It seeks to build our knowledge of the socio-political influences on the profession’s emergence and development, and the projected drivers of its future. Eight critical, socio-political drivers were identified and are addressed in temporaneous order. Scientific medicine has reflected the influences on medicine in the past century and a half of the medical record and other technologies, laboratory-based sciences, evidence-based medicine and evidence-based health. Standardisation has underpinned and guided the profession’s practice. The hegemony of non-medical healthcare managers and resource- and performance-related accountabilities emerged in the 1960s, as did the efficiencies of bureaucratisation in healthcare and post-bureaucratic shifts to textualisation and technogovernance. Technologisation has driven constant change in health information management, as have the forces of the fast-paced risk society. Since the 1980s, the health consumer movement has propelled regulatory mechanisms that accord patients’ access rights to their medical records and mandate information privacy protections. Finally, a nascent commodification of health information has emerged. These forces exert ongoing impacts on the profession. They will, we conclude, singularly and collectively continue to shape its discourses and direction.

Original language	English
Journal	Health Information Management Journal
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583211070336
Publication status	Accepted/In press - 2022

Keywords

electronic medical records
health ICT
health information
health information manager
health professions
medical records
scientific medicine
standardisation

Access to Document

10.1177/18333583211070336

Cite this

@article{0c120469be784f3e8fb270fdd346d526,

title = "The historiography of a profession: The societal and political drivers of the health information management profession in Australia",

abstract = "Health information permeates healthcare delivery from point-of-care, across the continuum of care and throughout the healthcare system{\textquoteright}s policy, population health, research, planning and funding arenas. Health information managers (HIMs) expertly manage that information. This commentary theorises the health information management profession for the first time. Its purpose is to identify and contextualise, via a historiographical account, the societal and political drivers that have shaped contemporary Australian health information management and HIMs{\textquoteright} scientific work. It seeks to build our knowledge of the socio-political influences on the profession{\textquoteright}s emergence and development, and the projected drivers of its future. Eight critical, socio-political drivers were identified and are addressed in temporaneous order. Scientific medicine has reflected the influences on medicine in the past century and a half of the medical record and other technologies, laboratory-based sciences, evidence-based medicine and evidence-based health. Standardisation has underpinned and guided the profession{\textquoteright}s practice. The hegemony of non-medical healthcare managers and resource- and performance-related accountabilities emerged in the 1960s, as did the efficiencies of bureaucratisation in healthcare and post-bureaucratic shifts to textualisation and technogovernance. Technologisation has driven constant change in health information management, as have the forces of the fast-paced risk society. Since the 1980s, the health consumer movement has propelled regulatory mechanisms that accord patients{\textquoteright} access rights to their medical records and mandate information privacy protections. Finally, a nascent commodification of health information has emerged. These forces exert ongoing impacts on the profession. They will, we conclude, singularly and collectively continue to shape its discourses and direction.",

keywords = "electronic medical records, health ICT, health information, health information manager, health professions, medical records, scientific medicine, standardisation",

author = "Kerin Robinson and Simon Barraclough and Elizabeth Cummings and Rick Iedema",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2022.",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1177/18333583211070336",

language = "English",

journal = "Health Information Management Journal",

issn = "1833-3583",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The historiography of a profession

T2 - The societal and political drivers of the health information management profession in Australia

AU - Robinson, Kerin

AU - Barraclough, Simon

AU - Cummings, Elizabeth

AU - Iedema, Rick

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2022.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Health information permeates healthcare delivery from point-of-care, across the continuum of care and throughout the healthcare system’s policy, population health, research, planning and funding arenas. Health information managers (HIMs) expertly manage that information. This commentary theorises the health information management profession for the first time. Its purpose is to identify and contextualise, via a historiographical account, the societal and political drivers that have shaped contemporary Australian health information management and HIMs’ scientific work. It seeks to build our knowledge of the socio-political influences on the profession’s emergence and development, and the projected drivers of its future. Eight critical, socio-political drivers were identified and are addressed in temporaneous order. Scientific medicine has reflected the influences on medicine in the past century and a half of the medical record and other technologies, laboratory-based sciences, evidence-based medicine and evidence-based health. Standardisation has underpinned and guided the profession’s practice. The hegemony of non-medical healthcare managers and resource- and performance-related accountabilities emerged in the 1960s, as did the efficiencies of bureaucratisation in healthcare and post-bureaucratic shifts to textualisation and technogovernance. Technologisation has driven constant change in health information management, as have the forces of the fast-paced risk society. Since the 1980s, the health consumer movement has propelled regulatory mechanisms that accord patients’ access rights to their medical records and mandate information privacy protections. Finally, a nascent commodification of health information has emerged. These forces exert ongoing impacts on the profession. They will, we conclude, singularly and collectively continue to shape its discourses and direction.

AB - Health information permeates healthcare delivery from point-of-care, across the continuum of care and throughout the healthcare system’s policy, population health, research, planning and funding arenas. Health information managers (HIMs) expertly manage that information. This commentary theorises the health information management profession for the first time. Its purpose is to identify and contextualise, via a historiographical account, the societal and political drivers that have shaped contemporary Australian health information management and HIMs’ scientific work. It seeks to build our knowledge of the socio-political influences on the profession’s emergence and development, and the projected drivers of its future. Eight critical, socio-political drivers were identified and are addressed in temporaneous order. Scientific medicine has reflected the influences on medicine in the past century and a half of the medical record and other technologies, laboratory-based sciences, evidence-based medicine and evidence-based health. Standardisation has underpinned and guided the profession’s practice. The hegemony of non-medical healthcare managers and resource- and performance-related accountabilities emerged in the 1960s, as did the efficiencies of bureaucratisation in healthcare and post-bureaucratic shifts to textualisation and technogovernance. Technologisation has driven constant change in health information management, as have the forces of the fast-paced risk society. Since the 1980s, the health consumer movement has propelled regulatory mechanisms that accord patients’ access rights to their medical records and mandate information privacy protections. Finally, a nascent commodification of health information has emerged. These forces exert ongoing impacts on the profession. They will, we conclude, singularly and collectively continue to shape its discourses and direction.

KW - electronic medical records

KW - health ICT

KW - health information

KW - health information manager

KW - health professions

KW - medical records

KW - scientific medicine

KW - standardisation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126793352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/18333583211070336

DO - 10.1177/18333583211070336

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85126793352

SN - 1833-3583

JO - Health Information Management Journal

JF - Health Information Management Journal

ER -

The historiography of a profession: The societal and political drivers of the health information management profession in Australia

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this