TY - JOUR
T1 - The IMAGEN study
T2 - a decade of imaging genetics in adolescents
AU - IMAGEN Consortium
AU - Mascarell Maričić, Lea
AU - Walter, Henrik
AU - Rosenthal, Annika
AU - Ripke, Stephan
AU - Quinlan, Erin Burke
AU - Banaschewski, Tobias
AU - Barker, Gareth J.
AU - Bokde, Arun L.W.
AU - Bromberg, Uli
AU - Büchel, Christian
AU - Desrivières, Sylvane
AU - Flor, Herta
AU - Frouin, Vincent
AU - Garavan, Hugh
AU - Itterman, Bernd
AU - Martinot, Jean Luc
AU - Martinot, Marie Laure Paillère
AU - Nees, Frauke
AU - Orfanos, Dimitri Papadopoulos
AU - Paus, Tomáš
AU - Poustka, Luise
AU - Hohmann, Sarah
AU - Smolka, Michael N.
AU - Fröhner, Juliane H.
AU - Whelan, Robert
AU - Kaminski, Jakob
AU - Schumann, Gunter
AU - Heinz, Andreas
AU - Albrecht, Lisa
AU - Andrew, Chris
AU - Arroyo, Mercedes
AU - Artiges, Eric
AU - Aydin, Semiha
AU - Bach, Christine
AU - Banaschewski, Tobias
AU - Barbot, Alexis
AU - Barker, Gareth
AU - Boddaert, Nathalie
AU - Bokde, Arun
AU - Bricaud, Zuleima
AU - Cattrell, Anna
AU - Conrod, Patricia
AU - Jia, Tianye
AU - Macare, Christine
AU - Mallik, Catherine
AU - Nymberg, Charlotte
AU - Reuter, Jan
AU - Ruggeri, Barbara
AU - Struve, Maren
AU - Topper, Lauren
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - Imaging genetics offers the possibility of detecting associations between genotype and brain structure as well as function, with effect sizes potentially exceeding correlations between genotype and behavior. However, study results are often limited due to small sample sizes and methodological differences, thus reducing the reliability of findings. The IMAGEN cohort with 2000 young adolescents assessed from the age of 14 onwards tries to eliminate some of these limitations by offering a longitudinal approach and sufficient sample size for analyzing gene-environment interactions on brain structure and function. Here, we give a systematic review of IMAGEN publications since the start of the consortium. We then focus on the specific phenotype ‘drug use’ to illustrate the potential of the IMAGEN approach. We describe findings with respect to frontocortical, limbic and striatal brain volume, functional activation elicited by reward anticipation, behavioral inhibition, and affective faces, and their respective associations with drug intake. In addition to describing its strengths, we also discuss limitations of the IMAGEN study. Because of the longitudinal design and related attrition, analyses are underpowered for (epi-) genome-wide approaches due to the limited sample size. Estimating the generalizability of results requires replications in independent samples. However, such densely phenotyped longitudinal studies are still rare and alternative internal cross-validation methods (e.g., leave-one out, split-half) are also warranted. In conclusion, the IMAGEN cohort is a unique, very well characterized longitudinal sample, which helped to elucidate neurobiological mechanisms involved in complex behavior and offers the possibility to further disentangle genotype × phenotype interactions.
AB - Imaging genetics offers the possibility of detecting associations between genotype and brain structure as well as function, with effect sizes potentially exceeding correlations between genotype and behavior. However, study results are often limited due to small sample sizes and methodological differences, thus reducing the reliability of findings. The IMAGEN cohort with 2000 young adolescents assessed from the age of 14 onwards tries to eliminate some of these limitations by offering a longitudinal approach and sufficient sample size for analyzing gene-environment interactions on brain structure and function. Here, we give a systematic review of IMAGEN publications since the start of the consortium. We then focus on the specific phenotype ‘drug use’ to illustrate the potential of the IMAGEN approach. We describe findings with respect to frontocortical, limbic and striatal brain volume, functional activation elicited by reward anticipation, behavioral inhibition, and affective faces, and their respective associations with drug intake. In addition to describing its strengths, we also discuss limitations of the IMAGEN study. Because of the longitudinal design and related attrition, analyses are underpowered for (epi-) genome-wide approaches due to the limited sample size. Estimating the generalizability of results requires replications in independent samples. However, such densely phenotyped longitudinal studies are still rare and alternative internal cross-validation methods (e.g., leave-one out, split-half) are also warranted. In conclusion, the IMAGEN cohort is a unique, very well characterized longitudinal sample, which helped to elucidate neurobiological mechanisms involved in complex behavior and offers the possibility to further disentangle genotype × phenotype interactions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087116712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41380-020-0822-5
DO - 10.1038/s41380-020-0822-5
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85087116712
SN - 1359-4184
VL - 25
SP - 2648
EP - 2671
JO - Molecular Psychiatry
JF - Molecular Psychiatry
IS - 11
ER -