Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Vinod Patel, Lucy Di Silvio, Jerry Kwok, Megan Burns, Rhonda Henley Smith, Selvam Thavaraj, Lorenzo Veschini
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1411-1421 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of Oral Rehabilitation |
Volume | 47 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs | |
Accepted/In press | 1 Jan 2020 |
Published | 1 Nov 2020 |
Additional links |
Objectives: Dental rehabilitation post-radiotherapy often requires the consideration of dental implants. However, these are tentatively prescribed due to the concern of hypovascularisation and possible osteoradionecrosis. Hence, the current study assessed the microvasculature of the dento-alveolar bone at implant sites taking into consideration the exact radiotherapy dose received to the region. Materials and methods: Bone cores were taken from nine patients during implant treatment and compared to nine control patients. Specimens were stained using CD31 and digitalised using a high-resolution scanner for qualitative and quantitative assessment of the microvasculature. Monaco® treatment planning system was used to volume the implant site providing mean dose (Dmean) and maximum dose (Dmax). Results: A total of 23 bone cores were retrieved for analysis. The cohort had a Dmean of 38.4 Gy (59.6-24.3 Gy). Qualitative analysis identified a clear reduction in the miniscule terminal capillaries and high incidence of obliterated lumens with increasing radiotherapy. Microvasculature density of irradiated patients was markedly reduced (P =.0034) compared to the control group with an inverse correlation to RT doses (P <.0001). Specifically, doses up to 30 Gy appear to preserve sufficient vascularisation (~77% in comparison with control) and tissue architecture. By contrast, exposure to higher doses 40%-61% of the micro-vessels were lost. Conclusion: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy doses above 30 Gy identified reduction in microvasculature which is a lower threshold than previously accepted. In pharyngeal cancer patients’ doses to the jaw bones often exceed this threshold. Coupled with favourable survival in certain oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal cancer, dental rehabilitation via implants provides a significant clinical challenge.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454