The nature of heterodox economics revisited

Yannick Slade-Caffarel

doi:10.1093/cje/bey043

The nature of heterodox economics revisited

Yannick Slade-Caffarel

Public Services Management & Org

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper revisits the conception of heterodox economics advanced by Tony Lawson in 2006 and critically assesses its reception. I consider the bearing of later contributions—most importantly, his 2013 paper ‘What is this “school” called neoclassical economics’—in which Lawson further develops his analysis of heterodox economics. The goal is to provide additional clarity to the discussion.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	527-539
Journal	CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS
Volume	43
Issue number	3
Early online date	31 Oct 2018
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bey043
Publication status	Published - May 2019

Access to Document

10.1093/cje/bey043

Cite this

@article{b6bbda189933443b98daef3986bd4ad7,

title = "The nature of heterodox economics revisited",

abstract = "This paper revisits the conception of heterodox economics advanced by Tony Lawson in 2006 and critically assesses its reception. I consider the bearing of later contributions—most importantly, his 2013 paper {\textquoteleft}What is this “school” called neoclassical economics{\textquoteright}—in which Lawson further develops his analysis of heterodox economics. The goal is to provide additional clarity to the discussion.",

author = "Yannick Slade-Caffarel",

year = "2019",

month = may,

doi = "10.1093/cje/bey043",

language = "English",

volume = "43",

pages = "527--539",

journal = "CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS",

issn = "0309-166X",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The nature of heterodox economics revisited

AU - Slade-Caffarel, Yannick

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - This paper revisits the conception of heterodox economics advanced by Tony Lawson in 2006 and critically assesses its reception. I consider the bearing of later contributions—most importantly, his 2013 paper ‘What is this “school” called neoclassical economics’—in which Lawson further develops his analysis of heterodox economics. The goal is to provide additional clarity to the discussion.

AB - This paper revisits the conception of heterodox economics advanced by Tony Lawson in 2006 and critically assesses its reception. I consider the bearing of later contributions—most importantly, his 2013 paper ‘What is this “school” called neoclassical economics’—in which Lawson further develops his analysis of heterodox economics. The goal is to provide additional clarity to the discussion.

U2 - 10.1093/cje/bey043

DO - 10.1093/cje/bey043

M3 - Article

SN - 0309-166X

VL - 43

SP - 527

EP - 539

JO - CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS

JF - CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS

IS - 3

ER -

The nature of heterodox economics revisited

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this