The need for supportive mental wellbeing interventions in bladder cancer patients: A systematic review of the literature

Agustina Bessa; Elke Rammant; Deborah Enting; Richard T. Bryan; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Sachin Malde; Rajesh Nair; Ramesh Thurairaja; Fidelma Cahill; Suzanne Amery; Sue Smith; Kamran Ahmed; Beth Russell; Charlotte Moss; Kathryn Chatterton; Christel Häggström; Mieke van Hemelrijck

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243136

The need for supportive mental wellbeing interventions in bladder cancer patients: A systematic review of the literature

Agustina Bessa^*, Elke Rammant, Deborah Enting, Richard T. Bryan, Muhammad Shamim Khan, Sachin Malde, Rajesh Nair, Ramesh Thurairaja, Fidelma Cahill, Suzanne Amery, Sue Smith, Kamran Ahmed, Beth Russell, Charlotte Moss, Kathryn Chatterton, Christel Häggström, Mieke van Hemelrijck

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives There is an increased awareness of the effect of a bladder cancer diagnosis and its treatments on the mental wellbeing of patients. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy, feasibility and acceptability of interventions to improve this mental wellbeing. This systematic review is the first phase of the Medical Research Council Framework for developing complex interventions and provides an overview of the published mental wellbeing interventions that could be used to design an intervention specific for BC patients. Methods This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines in January 2019 and studies were identified by conducting searches for Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Ovid Gateway. All included studies met the following criteria: mental wellbeing interventions of adults with medically confirmed diagnosis of any type of urological cancer, reported outcomes for specific HRQoL domains including psychological factors. The quality of evidence was assessed according to Down and Black 27-item checklist. Results A total of 15,094 records were collected from the literature search and 10 studies matched the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, nine interventions were for patients with prostate cancer and one for patients with kidney cancer. No studies were found for other urological cancers. Depression was the most commonly reported endpoint measured. Of the included studies with positive efficacy, three were group interventions and two were couple

Original language	English
Article number	e0243136
Journal	PLoS ONE
Volume	16
Issue number	1 January
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243136
Publication status	Published - Jan 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1371/journal.pone.0243136

Cite this

Bessa, A., Rammant, E., Enting, D., Bryan, R. T., Khan, M. S., Malde, S., Nair, R., Thurairaja, R., Cahill, F., Amery, S., Smith, S., Ahmed, K., Russell, B., Moss, C., Chatterton, K., Häggström, C., & van Hemelrijck, M. (2021). The need for supportive mental wellbeing interventions in bladder cancer patients: A systematic review of the literature. PLoS ONE, 16(1 January), Article e0243136. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243136

@article{9b6d15f899fa42519a1cdfc7fbafadd4,

title = "The need for supportive mental wellbeing interventions in bladder cancer patients: A systematic review of the literature",

abstract = "Objectives There is an increased awareness of the effect of a bladder cancer diagnosis and its treatments on the mental wellbeing of patients. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy, feasibility and acceptability of interventions to improve this mental wellbeing. This systematic review is the first phase of the Medical Research Council Framework for developing complex interventions and provides an overview of the published mental wellbeing interventions that could be used to design an intervention specific for BC patients. Methods This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines in January 2019 and studies were identified by conducting searches for Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Ovid Gateway. All included studies met the following criteria: mental wellbeing interventions of adults with medically confirmed diagnosis of any type of urological cancer, reported outcomes for specific HRQoL domains including psychological factors. The quality of evidence was assessed according to Down and Black 27-item checklist. Results A total of 15,094 records were collected from the literature search and 10 studies matched the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, nine interventions were for patients with prostate cancer and one for patients with kidney cancer. No studies were found for other urological cancers. Depression was the most commonly reported endpoint measured. Of the included studies with positive efficacy, three were group interventions and two were couple",

author = "Agustina Bessa and Elke Rammant and Deborah Enting and Bryan, {Richard T.} and Khan, {Muhammad Shamim} and Sachin Malde and Rajesh Nair and Ramesh Thurairaja and Fidelma Cahill and Suzanne Amery and Sue Smith and Kamran Ahmed and Beth Russell and Charlotte Moss and Kathryn Chatterton and Christel H{\"a}ggstr{\"o}m and {van Hemelrijck}, Mieke",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Bessa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",

year = "2021",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0243136",

language = "English",

volume = "16",

journal = "PLoS ONE",

issn = "1932-6203",

publisher = "Public Library of Science",

number = "1 January",

}

Bessa, A, Rammant, E, Enting, D, Bryan, RT, Khan, MS, Malde, S, Nair, R, Thurairaja, R, Cahill, F, Amery, S, Smith, S, Ahmed, K, Russell, B, Moss, C, Chatterton, K, Häggström, C & van Hemelrijck, M 2021, 'The need for supportive mental wellbeing interventions in bladder cancer patients: A systematic review of the literature', PLoS ONE, vol. 16, no. 1 January, e0243136. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243136

TY - JOUR

T1 - The need for supportive mental wellbeing interventions in bladder cancer patients

T2 - A systematic review of the literature

AU - Bessa, Agustina

AU - Rammant, Elke

AU - Enting, Deborah

AU - Bryan, Richard T.

AU - Khan, Muhammad Shamim

AU - Malde, Sachin

AU - Nair, Rajesh

AU - Thurairaja, Ramesh

AU - Cahill, Fidelma

AU - Amery, Suzanne

AU - Smith, Sue

AU - Ahmed, Kamran

AU - Russell, Beth

AU - Moss, Charlotte

AU - Chatterton, Kathryn

AU - Häggström, Christel

AU - van Hemelrijck, Mieke

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Bessa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2021/1

Y1 - 2021/1

N2 - Objectives There is an increased awareness of the effect of a bladder cancer diagnosis and its treatments on the mental wellbeing of patients. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy, feasibility and acceptability of interventions to improve this mental wellbeing. This systematic review is the first phase of the Medical Research Council Framework for developing complex interventions and provides an overview of the published mental wellbeing interventions that could be used to design an intervention specific for BC patients. Methods This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines in January 2019 and studies were identified by conducting searches for Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Ovid Gateway. All included studies met the following criteria: mental wellbeing interventions of adults with medically confirmed diagnosis of any type of urological cancer, reported outcomes for specific HRQoL domains including psychological factors. The quality of evidence was assessed according to Down and Black 27-item checklist. Results A total of 15,094 records were collected from the literature search and 10 studies matched the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, nine interventions were for patients with prostate cancer and one for patients with kidney cancer. No studies were found for other urological cancers. Depression was the most commonly reported endpoint measured. Of the included studies with positive efficacy, three were group interventions and two were couple

AB - Objectives There is an increased awareness of the effect of a bladder cancer diagnosis and its treatments on the mental wellbeing of patients. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy, feasibility and acceptability of interventions to improve this mental wellbeing. This systematic review is the first phase of the Medical Research Council Framework for developing complex interventions and provides an overview of the published mental wellbeing interventions that could be used to design an intervention specific for BC patients. Methods This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines in January 2019 and studies were identified by conducting searches for Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Ovid Gateway. All included studies met the following criteria: mental wellbeing interventions of adults with medically confirmed diagnosis of any type of urological cancer, reported outcomes for specific HRQoL domains including psychological factors. The quality of evidence was assessed according to Down and Black 27-item checklist. Results A total of 15,094 records were collected from the literature search and 10 studies matched the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, nine interventions were for patients with prostate cancer and one for patients with kidney cancer. No studies were found for other urological cancers. Depression was the most commonly reported endpoint measured. Of the included studies with positive efficacy, three were group interventions and two were couple

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100300133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0243136

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0243136

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85100300133

SN - 1932-6203

VL - 16

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

IS - 1 January

M1 - e0243136

ER -

The need for supportive mental wellbeing interventions in bladder cancer patients: A systematic review of the literature

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this