King's College London

Research portal

The PACT advance decision-making template: preparing for Mental Health Act reforms with co-production, focus groups and consultation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Article number101563
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Volume71
Early online date2020
DOIs
Accepted/In press17 Apr 2020
E-pub ahead of print2020
Published1 Jul 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust – grant number 203376/Z/16/Z Acknowledgements Dr Isabelle Ekdawi Dr Lorraine Gordon Prof George Szmukler Tom Prater

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

Background
Advance decision making (ADM) in mental health is supported by stakeholders but faces significant barriers. These must be overcome, not least to support the UK government’s commitment to introduce statutory mental health ADM in England and Wales.
Aims
To build understanding and address the gap between aspirations for ADM and actuality, with feasible co-produced ADM resources.
Methods
We used focus groups and consultation to explore experience and views of stakeholders on ADM processes and materials. Discussions included feedback on an ADM template which was adapted accordingly throughout the research process.
Results
Between September 2017 and December 2019, 94 individuals, representing stakeholders advised on design and process of ADM, alongside wider discussion at stakeholder events. Collaborative ADM was universally supported. Valued outcomes were diverse and combining aspirations with practicality required resolving dilemmas. A prototype template and guidance, the PACT (Preferences and Advance decisions for Crisis and Treatment) was co-produced, designed to help manage fluctuating mental capacity through collaborative decision making. The PACT enables direct engagement with medico-legal frameworks, with provision to facilitate person-centred assessments, treatment refusals and requests. Resources including supported engagement and cross-agency awareness and accessibility were seen as essential.

Conclusion
Our research confirms high stakeholder motivation to engage in ADM is hampered by multiple barriers. We identified enabling conditions for ADM and co-produced an ADM template and guidance which supports achievement of a range of valued outcomes. Further developments to support and evaluate the process of implementation are now needed to prepare for statutory change.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454