Abstract
Research on the relationship between ideology and affective polarisation highlights ideological disagreement as a key driver of animosity between partisan groups. By operationalising disagreement on the left–right dimension, however, existing studies often overlook voter–party incongruence as a potential determinant of affective evaluations. How does incongruence on policy issues impact affective evaluations of mainstream political parties and their leaders? We tackle this question by analysing data from the British Election Study collected ahead of the 2019 UK General Election using an instrumental variable approach. Consistent with our expectations, we find that voter–party incongruence has a significant causal impact on affective evaluations. Perceived representational gaps between party and voter drive negative evaluations of the in-party and positive evaluations of the opposition, thus lowering affective polarisation overall. The results offer a more nuanced perspective on the role of ideological conflict in driving affective polarisation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 668-685 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | British Journal of Politics and International Relations |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 6 Oct 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2022 |
Keywords
- affective evaluations
- ideology
- incongruence
- representation
- United Kingdom