The political impacts of adaptation actions: social contracts, a research agenda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)
115 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Managing climate and disaster risk is a deeply political act sitting at the interface of popular expectations, legal mandate, and political fiat. This article makes the case for an expanded research agenda on social contracts in climate and disasters scholarship as a mechanism to better reveal activity across this interface, identify the winners and losers of adaptation, and improve the equity outcomes of negotiated and imposed risk management settlements. Social contracts are defined as multiple and constructed (not singular or fixed), and three distinct yet intersecting forms of social contracts are identified: imagined, practiced, and legal‐institutional. The article argues that mapping the disjunctures, overlaps and transitions between these concurrent social contracts can help reveal gaps between responsibilities held de facto and de jure. This makes a timely contribution to understanding tensions between need, obligation and entitlement that underlie contestations over “who” is responsible for “what” in risk governance. It also helps reveal the dynamic boundaries of social acceptances at the centre of debates around fair adaptation governance. Such work can provide insight on how development relations, including but reaching beyond risk management and climate change adaptation, can be transformed progressively and fairly in a changing climate.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere549
Number of pages8
JournalWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Climate Change
Volume9
Issue number9
Early online date31 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The political impacts of adaptation actions: social contracts, a research agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this