King's College London

Research portal

The Political Morality of Nudges in Healthcare

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNudging Health
Subtitle of host publicationHealth Law and Behavioral Economics
EditorsI. Glenn Cohen, Holly Fernandez Lynch, Christopher T. Robertson
Place of PublicationBaltimore
PublisherJohns Hopkins University Press
Chapter8
Pages97-106
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9781421421025
ISBN (Print)9781421421018, 9781421421001
Published1 Dec 2016

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

A common critique of nudges is that they reduce someone's of choices or elicit behavior through means other than rational persuasion. In this paper, I argue against this form of critique. I argue that, if there is anything distinctively worrisome about nudges from the standpoint of morality, it is is their tendency to hide the amount of social control that they embody, undermining democratic governance by making it more difficult for members of a political community to detect the social architect’s pulling of the strings. This concern is particularly salient as to choices where it is important for people to directly engage with a certain set of values, “big personal decisions” (to use a simplifying phrase). Many healthcare decisions are exactly these kinds of choices.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454