King's College London

Research portal

The Politicisation of Hybrid Courts: Observations from the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Tomas Hamilton, Michael Phillip Ramsden

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-147
Number of pages33
JournalInternational criminal law review
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Published2014

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

The use of ‘hybrid’ tribunals as a means to secure accountability for international crimes seeks to combine national ownership over the trials whilst providing a framework for the inclusion of international standards and personnel in the proceedings. The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) represents one such hybrid experiment. Yet the ECCC has faced recurring allegations of political interference. These allegations are substantial and even if not always verifiable at least create an appearance of impropriety. The failure of the ECCC and United Nations to adequately address these allegations derived from a hybrid model that failed to provide sufficient safeguards against interference. The international community agreed on a solution to secure accountability with awareness that the trials were likely to be politically tainted. As such, the experiment in Cambodia provides a cautionary tale for the future design of hybrid tribunals.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454