King's College London

Research portal

The problem with reproductive freedom. Procreation beyond procreators’ interests

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Standard

The problem with reproductive freedom. Procreation beyond procreators’ interests. / Cavaliere, Giulia.

In: Medicine Health Care And Philosophy, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Harvard

Cavaliere, G 2019, 'The problem with reproductive freedom. Procreation beyond procreators’ interests', Medicine Health Care And Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09917-3

APA

Cavaliere, G. (2019). The problem with reproductive freedom. Procreation beyond procreators’ interests. Medicine Health Care And Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09917-3

Vancouver

Cavaliere G. The problem with reproductive freedom. Procreation beyond procreators’ interests. Medicine Health Care And Philosophy. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09917-3

Author

Cavaliere, Giulia. / The problem with reproductive freedom. Procreation beyond procreators’ interests. In: Medicine Health Care And Philosophy. 2019.

Bibtex Download

@article{fce14b5d50e04e029eaeea75f0a42a0b,
title = "The problem with reproductive freedom. Procreation beyond procreators{\textquoteright} interests",
abstract = "Reproductive freedom plays a pivotal role in debates on the ethics of procreation. This moral principle protects people{\textquoteright}s interests in procreative matters and allows them discretion over whether to have children, the number of children they have and, to a certain extent, the type of children they have. Reproductive freedom{\textquoteright}s theoretical and political emphasis on people{\textquoteright}s autonomy and well-being is grounded in an individual-centred framework for discussing the ethics of procreation. It protects procreators{\textquoteright} interests and significantly reduces the permissible grounds for interference by third parties. In this article I show that procreative decisions have far-reaching effects on the composition and size of the population. The upshot of considering these effects allows for the appreciation of the inadequacy of a framework that solely considers individual (i.e. procreators{\textquoteright}) interests to discuss the ethics of procreation. To address such inadequacy, I assess costs and benefits of past and present proposals to reflect on procreation in such a way as to consider its far-reaching effects. I conclude by arguing that reproductive freedom should be defended as an imperfect but instrumentally necessary tool. This framing would enable those participating in debates on the ethics of procreative decisions to work towards an ethical framework that accounts for the cumulative effects of these decisions.",
keywords = "Climate change, Eugenics, Procreation, Reproductive freedom",
author = "Giulia Cavaliere",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/s11019-019-09917-3",
language = "English",
journal = "Medicine Health Care And Philosophy",
issn = "1386-7423",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The problem with reproductive freedom. Procreation beyond procreators’ interests

AU - Cavaliere, Giulia

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Reproductive freedom plays a pivotal role in debates on the ethics of procreation. This moral principle protects people’s interests in procreative matters and allows them discretion over whether to have children, the number of children they have and, to a certain extent, the type of children they have. Reproductive freedom’s theoretical and political emphasis on people’s autonomy and well-being is grounded in an individual-centred framework for discussing the ethics of procreation. It protects procreators’ interests and significantly reduces the permissible grounds for interference by third parties. In this article I show that procreative decisions have far-reaching effects on the composition and size of the population. The upshot of considering these effects allows for the appreciation of the inadequacy of a framework that solely considers individual (i.e. procreators’) interests to discuss the ethics of procreation. To address such inadequacy, I assess costs and benefits of past and present proposals to reflect on procreation in such a way as to consider its far-reaching effects. I conclude by arguing that reproductive freedom should be defended as an imperfect but instrumentally necessary tool. This framing would enable those participating in debates on the ethics of procreative decisions to work towards an ethical framework that accounts for the cumulative effects of these decisions.

AB - Reproductive freedom plays a pivotal role in debates on the ethics of procreation. This moral principle protects people’s interests in procreative matters and allows them discretion over whether to have children, the number of children they have and, to a certain extent, the type of children they have. Reproductive freedom’s theoretical and political emphasis on people’s autonomy and well-being is grounded in an individual-centred framework for discussing the ethics of procreation. It protects procreators’ interests and significantly reduces the permissible grounds for interference by third parties. In this article I show that procreative decisions have far-reaching effects on the composition and size of the population. The upshot of considering these effects allows for the appreciation of the inadequacy of a framework that solely considers individual (i.e. procreators’) interests to discuss the ethics of procreation. To address such inadequacy, I assess costs and benefits of past and present proposals to reflect on procreation in such a way as to consider its far-reaching effects. I conclude by arguing that reproductive freedom should be defended as an imperfect but instrumentally necessary tool. This framing would enable those participating in debates on the ethics of procreative decisions to work towards an ethical framework that accounts for the cumulative effects of these decisions.

KW - Climate change

KW - Eugenics

KW - Procreation

KW - Reproductive freedom

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070902790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11019-019-09917-3

DO - 10.1007/s11019-019-09917-3

M3 - Review article

JO - Medicine Health Care And Philosophy

JF - Medicine Health Care And Philosophy

SN - 1386-7423

ER -

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454