King's College London

Research portal

The relationship between citations, downloads and alternative metrics in rheumatology publications: a bibliometric study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

The relationship between citations, downloads and alternative metrics in rheumatology publications : a bibliometric study. / Chen, Winnie M.Y.; Bukhari, Marwan; Cockshull, Francesca; Galloway, James.

In: Rheumatology (Oxford, England), Vol. 59, No. 2, 01.02.2020, p. 277-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Chen, WMY, Bukhari, M, Cockshull, F & Galloway, J 2020, 'The relationship between citations, downloads and alternative metrics in rheumatology publications: a bibliometric study', Rheumatology (Oxford, England), vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 277-280. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez163

APA

Chen, W. M. Y., Bukhari, M., Cockshull, F., & Galloway, J. (2020). The relationship between citations, downloads and alternative metrics in rheumatology publications: a bibliometric study. Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 59(2), 277-280. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez163

Vancouver

Chen WMY, Bukhari M, Cockshull F, Galloway J. The relationship between citations, downloads and alternative metrics in rheumatology publications: a bibliometric study. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2020 Feb 1;59(2):277-280. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez163

Author

Chen, Winnie M.Y. ; Bukhari, Marwan ; Cockshull, Francesca ; Galloway, James. / The relationship between citations, downloads and alternative metrics in rheumatology publications : a bibliometric study. In: Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2020 ; Vol. 59, No. 2. pp. 277-280.

Bibtex Download

@article{e78cad65028441ceb0ab55d25105cf21,
title = "The relationship between citations, downloads and alternative metrics in rheumatology publications: a bibliometric study",
abstract = "Objective: Scientific journals and authors are frequently judged on 'impact'. Commonly used traditional metrics are the Impact Factor and H-index. However, both take several years to formulate and have many limitations. Recently, Altmetric-a metric that measures impact in a non-traditional way-has gained popularity. This project aims to describe the relationships between subject matter, citations, downloads and Altmetric within rheumatology. Methods. Data from publications in Rheumatology were used. Articles published from 2010 to 2015 were reviewed. Data were analysed using Stata 14.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Correlation between citations, downloads and Altmetric were quantified using linear regression, comparing across disease topics. Relationship between downloads and months since publications were described using negative binomial regression, clustering on individual articles. Results. A total of 1460 Basic Science and Clinical Science articles were identified, with the number of citations, downloads and Altmetric scores. There were no correlations between disease topic and downloads (R 2 = 0.016, P = 0.03), citations (R 2 = 0.011, P = 0.29) or Altmetric (R 2 = 0.025, P = 0.02). A statistically significant positive association was seen between the number of citations and downloads (R 2 = 0.29, P < 0.001). No correlations were seen between Altmetric and downloads (R 2 = 0.028, P < 0.001) or citations (R 2 = 0.004, P = 0.445). Conclusion. Disease area did not correlate with any of the metrics compared. Correlations were apparent with clear links between downloads and citations. Altmetric identified different articles as high impact compared with citation or download metrics. In conclusion: tweeting about your research does not appear to influence citations. ",
keywords = "Altmetric, Citations, Download, Research impact, Twitter",
author = "Chen, {Winnie M.Y.} and Marwan Bukhari and Francesca Cockshull and James Galloway",
year = "2020",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/rheumatology/kez163",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "277--280",
journal = "Rheumatology",
issn = "1462-0324",
number = "2",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relationship between citations, downloads and alternative metrics in rheumatology publications

T2 - a bibliometric study

AU - Chen, Winnie M.Y.

AU - Bukhari, Marwan

AU - Cockshull, Francesca

AU - Galloway, James

PY - 2020/2/1

Y1 - 2020/2/1

N2 - Objective: Scientific journals and authors are frequently judged on 'impact'. Commonly used traditional metrics are the Impact Factor and H-index. However, both take several years to formulate and have many limitations. Recently, Altmetric-a metric that measures impact in a non-traditional way-has gained popularity. This project aims to describe the relationships between subject matter, citations, downloads and Altmetric within rheumatology. Methods. Data from publications in Rheumatology were used. Articles published from 2010 to 2015 were reviewed. Data were analysed using Stata 14.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Correlation between citations, downloads and Altmetric were quantified using linear regression, comparing across disease topics. Relationship between downloads and months since publications were described using negative binomial regression, clustering on individual articles. Results. A total of 1460 Basic Science and Clinical Science articles were identified, with the number of citations, downloads and Altmetric scores. There were no correlations between disease topic and downloads (R 2 = 0.016, P = 0.03), citations (R 2 = 0.011, P = 0.29) or Altmetric (R 2 = 0.025, P = 0.02). A statistically significant positive association was seen between the number of citations and downloads (R 2 = 0.29, P < 0.001). No correlations were seen between Altmetric and downloads (R 2 = 0.028, P < 0.001) or citations (R 2 = 0.004, P = 0.445). Conclusion. Disease area did not correlate with any of the metrics compared. Correlations were apparent with clear links between downloads and citations. Altmetric identified different articles as high impact compared with citation or download metrics. In conclusion: tweeting about your research does not appear to influence citations.

AB - Objective: Scientific journals and authors are frequently judged on 'impact'. Commonly used traditional metrics are the Impact Factor and H-index. However, both take several years to formulate and have many limitations. Recently, Altmetric-a metric that measures impact in a non-traditional way-has gained popularity. This project aims to describe the relationships between subject matter, citations, downloads and Altmetric within rheumatology. Methods. Data from publications in Rheumatology were used. Articles published from 2010 to 2015 were reviewed. Data were analysed using Stata 14.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Correlation between citations, downloads and Altmetric were quantified using linear regression, comparing across disease topics. Relationship between downloads and months since publications were described using negative binomial regression, clustering on individual articles. Results. A total of 1460 Basic Science and Clinical Science articles were identified, with the number of citations, downloads and Altmetric scores. There were no correlations between disease topic and downloads (R 2 = 0.016, P = 0.03), citations (R 2 = 0.011, P = 0.29) or Altmetric (R 2 = 0.025, P = 0.02). A statistically significant positive association was seen between the number of citations and downloads (R 2 = 0.29, P < 0.001). No correlations were seen between Altmetric and downloads (R 2 = 0.028, P < 0.001) or citations (R 2 = 0.004, P = 0.445). Conclusion. Disease area did not correlate with any of the metrics compared. Correlations were apparent with clear links between downloads and citations. Altmetric identified different articles as high impact compared with citation or download metrics. In conclusion: tweeting about your research does not appear to influence citations.

KW - Altmetric

KW - Citations

KW - Download

KW - Research impact

KW - Twitter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078555133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/rheumatology/kez163

DO - 10.1093/rheumatology/kez163

M3 - Article

C2 - 31074830

VL - 59

SP - 277

EP - 280

JO - Rheumatology

JF - Rheumatology

SN - 1462-0324

IS - 2

ER -

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454