The role of ideas in EU responses to international crises: Comparing the cases of Iraq and Iran

Benjamin Kienzle*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
249 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines how cognitive and normative ideas influence the ability of the European Union (EU) to formulate common policies in response to international crises such as the 2002-2003 Iraq crisis and the Iranian nuclear crisis (since 2002). It argues that in crisis situations, i.e. in highly uncertain circumstances, ideas often become the principal guide for policy-makers. More specifically, ideas foster interpretations of a crisis along several core themes: above all, how the crisis issue is perceived, which means are deemed to be legitimate and/or effective and, depending on the particular crisis, how other relevant themes are seen, e.g. the appropriate relationship with the United States. Thus, the formulation of common EU crisis response depends on the convergence of these interpretations in Member States - as in the Iran crisis. On the contrary, if Member States' interpretations diverge beyond a common 'ideational space' - as in the case of Iraq - dissonance will be the probable outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)424-443
Number of pages20
JournalCooperation and Conflict
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2013

Keywords

  • Cognitive and normative ideas
  • European foreign and security policy
  • ideas and foreign policy
  • international crises
  • Iran
  • Iraq

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of ideas in EU responses to international crises: Comparing the cases of Iraq and Iran'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this