King's College London

Research portal

The role of partisan cues in voter mobilization campaigns: Evidence from a randomized field experiment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Florian Foos, Eline A. de Rooij

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-74
Number of pages13
JournalELECTORAL STUDIES
Volume45
Issue number1
Early online date16 Nov 2016
DOIs
Accepted/In press14 Nov 2016
E-pub ahead of print16 Nov 2016
PublishedFeb 2017

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

The transmission of partisan appeals during election campaigns is widely believed to aid the formation of citizens' candidate preferences, or to serve as rallying cries, thereby increasing turnout. While laboratory and survey experiments show that partisan cues help citizens decide between candidates, and partisan elections see higher turnout than non-partisan elections, it is unclear if party labels and partisan rhetoric cause voters to turn out in higher numbers in real-world elections. We exploit a low-information election in the UK to randomly assign whether campaign phone messages include strong partisan cues or pro- mote the same candidate without such cues. Whereas we find no significant difference in the overall effectiveness of messages with and without partisan cues at increasing turnout, the effectiveness of the former is moderated by party preference: Consistent with the use of acceptance-rejection heuristics, campaign calls with partisan cues are more likely to mobilize party supporters than rival partisans.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454